We'll see

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #136,914 by ben_tilly 1/21/04 2:31:57 PM Reply	We'll see I'm just saying that I can see why Microsoft's lawyers did what they did. I didn't say that I liked it. Ben "good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not" - [link\|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html\|Stefano Mazzocchi]
Post #136,934 by mmoffitt 1/21/04 3:41:47 PM Reply	My sentiments exactly. bcnu, Mikem I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.
Post #136,972 by jb4 1/21/04 6:13:44 PM Reply	Re: We'll see Oh, I agree. And they may even prevail. I'm just saying that it's not the slam dunk that the lead post of this thread implied that it was. jb4 shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub* + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf.* BULLSHIT

Mike Rowe Soft - (boxley) - (24) - Jan. 20, 2004, 09:00:25 PM EST

I love the names of the lawyers - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 20, 2004, 09:08:28 PM EST

This one's not bad. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:12:22 PM EST

I say, I say. It's a JOKE son. - (Silverlock) - (8) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:56:00 PM EST

Getting lots of play up here - (jake123) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:21:48 PM EST

When was the last time Micros~1 worried... - (jb4) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:26:56 PM EST

Different market - (jake123) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:39:27 PM EST

But Mike has a point on this one - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:26:28 PM EST

There is one fly in the ointment for Micros~1: - (jb4) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:29:25 PM EST

We'll see - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:31:57 PM EST

My sentiments exactly. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:41:47 PM EST

Re: We'll see - (jb4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 06:13:44 PM EST

latest news, microsoft was perhaps hasty - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:37:39 PM EST

Yeah, somebody woke up - (jake123) - Jan. 22, 2004, 03:19:46 PM EST

Words fail - (Steve Lowe) - (9) - Jan. 31, 2004, 01:24:06 AM EST

so he only has 2 copies - (cforde) - Jan. 31, 2004, 02:30:24 AM EST

Now over $45K w/129 bids!!! -NT - (jbrabeck) - (4) - Jan. 31, 2004, 08:49:12 AM EST

Now just shy of 102K USD. -NT - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 31, 2004, 09:49:25 PM EST

Up at $20,560,100.00 now. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 2, 2004, 10:51:45 AM EST

Pretty obvious what's happening - (drewk) - Feb. 2, 2004, 11:28:10 AM EST

Now down to $8,300.00 -NT - (jbrabeck) - Feb. 2, 2004, 03:17:48 PM EST

guess who is doing the bidding? :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2004, 11:23:13 AM EST

ROFL! ...to leave no trace. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 31, 2004, 09:54:19 PM EST

Do-over - (Steve Lowe) - Feb. 3, 2004, 12:02:08 PM EST

Reminds me of Slash Zero Software - (orion) - Feb. 1, 2004, 12:56:39 AM EST

The parity bit is a bit that detects an error in itself 1/9th of the time.
100 ms