Look a couple up - I said "was"

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #136,903 by mmoffitt 1/21/04 2:18:26 PM 1/21/04 2:19:03 PM Reply	Look a couple up - I said "was" Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. bcnu, Mikem I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java. Edited by mmoffitt Jan. 21, 2004, 02:19:03 PM EST Look a couple up - I said "was" bcnu, Mikem I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java. Collapse All History
Post #136,920 by drewk 1/21/04 2:58:04 PM Reply	Not exactly What you said was: Of course, that was when there was a Rhodes scholar in Seat Number 1 You didn't say Clinton was a Rhodes scholar. You said there was a Rhodes scholar as president. That means that he was a Rhodes scholar while he was president. He wasn't. He was a former Rhodes scholar when he was president. :-P === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #136,926 by mmoffitt 1/21/04 3:27:51 PM Reply	Mea Culpa - should have been "former Rhodes scholar" But, and this is my own ignorance, I always considered the "former" implied. bcnu, Mikem I don't do third world languages. So no, I don't do Java.
Post #137,039 by Ashton 1/22/04 6:51:17 AM Reply	Much ado about straw- Colossus of Rhodesism All US Presidents are addressed as "Mr. President" - for life. Ditto Judges, many military, oodles of "Doctors", Professori Emeriti yada. Once, ever a "Rhodes Scholar" - as assuredly, a "Rhodes Scholar" in perpetuity. (Did his scholarship / scholarliness cease to exist at the end of some time period?) Pshaw, or as Bill the Cat sez Ack Phhhhbbbbbbtttttt

The case for lying (aka State of the Union Address). - (mmoffitt) - (72) - Jan. 21, 2004, 08:51:59 AM EST

Bring it on... - (danreck) - (71) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:09:44 AM EST

Cheney an intellectual? - (mmoffitt) - (66) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:01 AM EST

Thank you for proving my point... - (danreck) - (61) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:07:34 PM EST

Here's a few clues for you. - (mmoffitt) - (60) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:00:39 PM EST

Back atcha, Mikey... - (danreck) - (59) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:21:06 PM EST

Litmus test question: - (jb4) - (8) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:50:11 PM EST

Since that subject was brought up in the bowels - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:03:39 PM EST

These people weren't taking flying lessons in '97 - (jb4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:05:19 PM EST

Talking out your ass again - (Silverlock) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:19 PM EST

the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:51:13 PM EST

If that's how you want to spin it. - (Silverlock) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:03:42 PM EST

Reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:35:12 PM EST

I read it and discarded the "Litmus" test - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 06:43:04 PM EST

Such an easy question; such incredible spin - (jb4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:38:21 AM EST

Yo, read your own links closer. - (mmoffitt) - (49) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:59:31 PM EST

Re: Yo, read your own links closer. - (admin) - (14) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:01 PM EST

Okay, - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:07:14 PM EST

Not AFAIK - (admin) - (12) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:36 PM EST

I guess it depends on your definition of "was" ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (11) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:58 PM EST

No. - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:10:34 PM EST

Yes. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:13:31 PM EST

No - (drewk) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:16:25 PM EST

Look a couple up - I said "was" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:19:03 PM EST

Not exactly - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:58:04 PM EST

Mea Culpa - should have been "former Rhodes scholar" - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:27:51 PM EST

Much ado about straw- Colossus of Rhodesism - (Ashton) - Jan. 22, 2004, 06:51:17 AM EST

Yep, you're right. - (admin) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:25:55 PM EST

Wouldn't asking Rhodes be the appropriate place - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:27:12 PM EST

Huh? <sarcasm> - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:25:59 PM EST

Chuckle - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:31:08 AM EST

So what? - (deSitter) - (33) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:56:26 PM EST

So what? Indeed. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:34:56 PM EST

Right. - (bepatient) - (31) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:27:41 PM EST

One misrepresentation - (jake123) - (30) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:39:58 PM EST

Doesn't matter... - (Simon_Jester) - (29) - Jan. 21, 2004, 09:47:23 PM EST

This was typical American Statesmanship - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:11:04 PM EST

Certainly, and both sides have been doing it for decades. -NT - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:29:35 AM EST

Riddle me this. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:39:28 AM EST

Abe Lincoln -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:49:36 AM EST

And the lie would be????? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:51:37 AM EST

Re: And the lie would be????? - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:25 AM EST

that the South was not entitled to secede -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:14:49 AM EST

That's not what I was ever taught. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:29:08 PM EST

Re: That's not what I was ever taught. - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:08 PM EST

Remember the Maine? - (Simon_Jester) - (15) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:48:15 AM EST

A few Nits. (Aside to Box) - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:56:25 AM EST

Alexander Hamilton -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:00:40 PM EST

still waiting - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:10 PM EST

Imminent domain dude ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:25:26 AM EST

any minute domain? or did you mean eminent? -NT - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:37:06 AM EST

AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:08:42 AM EST

Eminem domain -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:25:19 AM EST

minimum dolman (who really started hostilities) - (boxley) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:39:44 AM EST

How 'bout Vera Cruz? -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:44 PM EST

"See no evil" before Pearl? -NT - (deSitter) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:40:26 PM EST

Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 04:42:47 PM EST

Such a simple, clear notion - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:38:23 AM EST

Re: Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:53:14 AM EST

You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (hnick) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 07:45:54 AM EST

Re: You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (deSitter) - Jan. 23, 2004, 08:03:48 AM EST

About these replies - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:31:02 AM EST

You and I (at least I think it was you) - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:46:29 AM EST

It would do - (jake123) - Jan. 22, 2004, 01:16:08 PM EST

That is my sense of an attitude towards US persons, thus far - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 06:05:30 AM EST

did you watch cheney/lieberman during the last go round? - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:19:15 PM EST

Not Breshnev era, Trotsky ;-) - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:02:42 PM EST

If you watched the VP debates last go round - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:00:39 PM EST

Cheney is not stupid. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:10 PM EST

Re: Bring it on... - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:43 AM EST

It the 50 percent of the people who don't vote that - (danreck) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:16:08 PM EST

settle for an amiable rogue? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:22:15 PM EST

A sucklessful candidate? -NT - (danreck) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:32:54 PM EST

My other car is a Matchbox.
99 ms