IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Talking out your ass again
Post #136,890
by Silverlock
1/21/04 2:06:19 PM
Reply
New Talking out your ass again
Try reading that question again and limiting the kneejerk response, ok?
-----------------------------------------
.sig pending
Post #136,937
by boxley
1/21/04 3:51:13 PM
Reply
New the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton
the answer was neither, and presented a valid reason for it. What could have been done to prevent 9/11 lots. Who had the guts to institute the changes needed to prevent it. No one did. Knee Jerk that.
thanx,
bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #136,954
by Silverlock
1/21/04 5:03:42 PM
Reply
New If that's how you want to spin it.
I read it as "Given what was known at the time, could the Bush admin have prevented 9/11". Hmmmm. Don't see Clinton mentioned there.

I repeat, kneejerk reaction.
-----------------------------------------
.sig pending
Post #136,963
by jb4
Picture of jb4
1/21/04 5:35:12 PM
Reply
New Reading is a skill...
Box opines:
the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton

Box fumbles again.

The real question was:
Do you believe the current "administration" did everything they could to prevent 9-11 before 9-11?
Sorry Box, these are different questions.

Point Silverlock.
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
Post #136,975
by boxley
1/21/04 6:43:04 PM
Reply
New I read it and discarded the "Litmus" test
then presented my opinion. Did shrub et all do everything they could to stop it fuck no and nether did anyone else. The closest that came to it was Gore who presented a plan to tighten security that was quickly shot down by EVERYBODY. If you think getting terrorists is a soley a partisan effort no wonder those fuckin muslims want to kill us.
thanx,
bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #137,066
by jb4
Picture of jb4
1/22/04 9:38:21 AM
Reply
New Such an easy question; such incredible spin
If this is the sort of "logic" we can expect, no wonder the fuckin neocons want to kill us.
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
     The case for lying (aka State of the Union Address). - (mmoffitt) - (72) - Jan. 21, 2004, 08:51:59 AM EST
         Bring it on... - (danreck) - (71) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:09:44 AM EST
             Cheney an intellectual? - (mmoffitt) - (66) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:01 AM EST
                 Thank you for proving my point... - (danreck) - (61) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:07:34 PM EST
                     Here's a few clues for you. - (mmoffitt) - (60) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:00:39 PM EST
                         Back atcha, Mikey... - (danreck) - (59) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:21:06 PM EST
                             Litmus test question: - (jb4) - (8) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:50:11 PM EST
                                 Since that subject was brought up in the bowels - (boxley) - (7) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:03:39 PM EST
                                     These people weren't taking flying lessons in '97 - (jb4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:05:19 PM EST
                                     Talking out your ass again - (Silverlock) - (5) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:19 PM EST
                                         the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:51:13 PM EST
                                             If that's how you want to spin it. - (Silverlock) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:03:42 PM EST
                                             Reading is a skill... - (jb4) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 05:35:12 PM EST
                                                 I read it and discarded the "Litmus" test - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 06:43:04 PM EST
                                                     Such an easy question; such incredible spin - (jb4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:38:21 AM EST
                             Yo, read your own links closer. - (mmoffitt) - (49) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:59:31 PM EST
                                 Re: Yo, read your own links closer. - (admin) - (14) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:01 PM EST
                                     Okay, - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:07:14 PM EST
                                         Not AFAIK - (admin) - (12) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:36 PM EST
                                             I guess it depends on your definition of "was" ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (11) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:08:58 PM EST
                                                 No. - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:10:34 PM EST
                                                     Yes. - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:13:31 PM EST
                                                         No - (drewk) - (4) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:16:25 PM EST
                                                             Look a couple up - I said "was" - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:19:03 PM EST
                                                                 Not exactly - (drewk) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:58:04 PM EST
                                                                     Mea Culpa - should have been "former Rhodes scholar" - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:27:51 PM EST
                                                                     Much ado about straw- Colossus of Rhodesism - (Ashton) - Jan. 22, 2004, 06:51:17 AM EST
                                                         Yep, you're right. - (admin) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:25:55 PM EST
                                                         Wouldn't asking Rhodes be the appropriate place - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:27:12 PM EST
                                                             Huh? <sarcasm> - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:25:59 PM EST
                                                                 Chuckle - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:31:08 AM EST
                                 So what? - (deSitter) - (33) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:56:26 PM EST
                                     So what? Indeed. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Jan. 21, 2004, 03:34:56 PM EST
                                         Right. - (bepatient) - (31) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:27:41 PM EST
                                             One misrepresentation - (jake123) - (30) - Jan. 21, 2004, 04:39:58 PM EST
                                                 Doesn't matter... - (Simon_Jester) - (29) - Jan. 21, 2004, 09:47:23 PM EST
                                                     This was typical American Statesmanship - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:11:04 PM EST
                                                         Certainly, and both sides have been doing it for decades. -NT - (Simon_Jester) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:29:35 AM EST
                                                     Riddle me this. - (mmoffitt) - (22) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:39:28 AM EST
                                                         Abe Lincoln -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:49:36 AM EST
                                                             And the lie would be????? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 09:51:37 AM EST
                                                                 Re: And the lie would be????? - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:25 AM EST
                                                                     that the South was not entitled to secede -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:14:49 AM EST
                                                                     That's not what I was ever taught. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:29:08 PM EST
                                                                         Re: That's not what I was ever taught. - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:08 PM EST
                                                         Remember the Maine? - (Simon_Jester) - (15) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:48:15 AM EST
                                                             A few Nits. (Aside to Box) - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:56:25 AM EST
                                                                 Alexander Hamilton -NT - (boxley) - (6) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:00:40 PM EST
                                                                     still waiting - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:13:10 PM EST
                                                                         Imminent domain dude ;-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:25:26 AM EST
                                                                             any minute domain? or did you mean eminent? -NT - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 23, 2004, 09:37:06 AM EST
                                                                                 AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:08:42 AM EST
                                                                                 Eminem domain -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:25:19 AM EST
                                                                                     minimum dolman (who really started hostilities) - (boxley) - Jan. 23, 2004, 10:39:44 AM EST
                                                             How 'bout Vera Cruz? -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:39:44 PM EST
                                                             "See no evil" before Pearl? -NT - (deSitter) - (5) - Jan. 22, 2004, 02:40:26 PM EST
                                                                 Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Jan. 22, 2004, 04:42:47 PM EST
                                                                     Such a simple, clear notion - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:38:23 AM EST
                                                                     Re: Again - Not Pre-Emptive War. - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 23, 2004, 05:53:14 AM EST
                                                                         You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (hnick) - (1) - Jan. 23, 2004, 07:45:54 AM EST
                                                                             Re: You keep saying the Irish don't like us any more - (deSitter) - Jan. 23, 2004, 08:03:48 AM EST
                                                     About these replies - (jake123) - (3) - Jan. 22, 2004, 10:31:02 AM EST
                                                         You and I (at least I think it was you) - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Jan. 22, 2004, 11:46:29 AM EST
                                                             It would do - (jake123) - Jan. 22, 2004, 01:16:08 PM EST
                                                         That is my sense of an attitude towards US persons, thus far - (Ashton) - Jan. 23, 2004, 06:05:30 AM EST
                 did you watch cheney/lieberman during the last go round? - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:19:15 PM EST
                     Not Breshnev era, Trotsky ;-) - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 01:02:42 PM EST
                         If you watched the VP debates last go round - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:00:39 PM EST
                             Cheney is not stupid. - (mmoffitt) - Jan. 21, 2004, 02:06:10 PM EST
             Re: Bring it on... - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 21, 2004, 10:22:43 AM EST
                 It the 50 percent of the people who don't vote that - (danreck) - (2) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:16:08 PM EST
                     settle for an amiable rogue? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:22:15 PM EST
                         A sucklessful candidate? -NT - (danreck) - Jan. 21, 2004, 12:32:54 PM EST

Now, right off the bat you have to worry about a recipe found in Chemical and Engineering News.
221 ms