Post #136,882
1/21/04 1:50:11 PM
|
Litmus test question:
Do you believe the current "administration" did everything they could to prevent 9-11 before 9-11? Or were they (intentionally or unintentionally) derelict? Given what we knew at that time, could the attack have been stopped or derailed?
If you think more could have been done with the intelligence we had, then you sir, are the blatherskite.
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
Post #136,886
1/21/04 2:03:39 PM
|
Since that subject was brought up in the bowels
of the FAA circa 1997 why wernt the precautions put in place then? Its not a Repo or Demo answer, it was the fucking public wouldnt put up with it.
thanx,
bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #136,887
1/21/04 2:05:19 PM
|
These people weren't taking flying lessons in '97
without bothering to learn how to land....
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
Post #136,890
1/21/04 2:06:19 PM
|
Talking out your ass again
Try reading that question again and limiting the kneejerk response, ok?
-----------------------------------------
.sig pending
|
Post #136,937
1/21/04 3:51:13 PM
|
the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton
the answer was neither, and presented a valid reason for it. What could have been done to prevent 9/11 lots. Who had the guts to institute the changes needed to prevent it. No one did. Knee Jerk that.
thanx,
bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #136,954
1/21/04 5:03:42 PM
|
If that's how you want to spin it.
I read it as "Given what was known at the time, could the Bush admin have prevented 9/11". Hmmmm. Don't see Clinton mentioned there.
I repeat, kneejerk reaction.
-----------------------------------------
.sig pending
|
Post #136,963
1/21/04 5:35:12 PM
|
Reading is a skill...
Box opines: the question was whose fault was it bush/clinton Box fumbles again. The real question was: Do you believe the current "administration" did everything they could to prevent 9-11 before 9-11? Sorry Box, these are different questions. Point Silverlock. jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
Post #136,975
1/21/04 6:43:04 PM
|
I read it and discarded the "Litmus" test
then presented my opinion. Did shrub et all do everything they could to stop it fuck no and nether did anyone else. The closest that came to it was Gore who presented a plan to tighten security that was quickly shot down by EVERYBODY. If you think getting terrorists is a soley a partisan effort no wonder those fuckin muslims want to kill us.
thanx,
bill
same old crap, con artists ripping off fools. Ah, hell, Catholic Church it start off that way. They All do. Jesus probably had three walnut shells one pea, then he's dead and can't be questioned,
Gabriel Dupre
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
|
Post #137,066
1/22/04 9:38:21 AM
|
Such an easy question; such incredible spin
If this is the sort of "logic" we can expect, no wonder the fuckin neocons want to kill us.
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating that facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT
|
