Two newborns die, but it's not terrorism. - (a6l6e6x) - (14) - Jan. 9, 2004, 08:39:13 PM EST
         Re: Two newborns die, but it's not terrorism. - (qstephens) - (2) - Jan. 13, 2004, 03:48:07 PM EST
             actually that is the less biased source try Aretz Shiva - (boxley) - Jan. 13, 2004, 08:43:01 PM EST
             Re: biased source? - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 13, 2004, 09:59:01 PM EST
         interesting post but whose fault is it? - (boxley) - (10) - Jan. 13, 2004, 08:41:15 PM EST
             Here is your answer - just in time - (Arkadiy) - (9) - Jan. 14, 2004, 07:09:11 AM EST
                 How soon they forget. - (a6l6e6x) - (8) - Jan. 14, 2004, 07:33:44 PM EST
                     all of the victors or just the jewish ones -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:46:07 PM EST
                         All of them! It's a Solomonic choice. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:51:11 PM EST
                             I got an Idea! - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:04:56 PM EST
                                 AK-47s for all? - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:56:20 PM EST
                     The Economist on suicide bombers. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 14, 2004, 11:28:40 PM EST
                         Good article, thanks! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 15, 2004, 12:11:39 AM EST
                     Thank you for changing topic - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:41:47 AM EST
                         Re: But in reality, I just don't see it happening. - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 15, 2004, 11:54:04 AM EST