drop down box with "SEND ALL" as well as each individual system, a text box for the message and a button for SEND.
I've also filtered out the server names as it got annoying having to click thru all the messages on them.
NET SEND to all except a few systems?
- (SpiceWare)
- (42)
- Dec. 5, 2003, 04:08:12 PM EST
Send to group
-NT
- (Silverlock)
- Dec. 5, 2003, 04:30:20 PM EST
If you send not to machine names, but...
- (CRConrad)
- (6)
- Dec. 7, 2003, 03:50:29 PM EST
Re: If you send not to machine names, but...
- (deSitter)
- (5)
- Dec. 7, 2003, 04:08:32 PM EST
"Messenger" != "NET SEND" ?
- (CRConrad)
- (4)
- Dec. 7, 2003, 06:48:13 PM EST
NET SEND Help
- (orion)
- Dec. 7, 2003, 08:13:06 PM EST
Re: "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ?
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- Dec. 7, 2003, 09:38:51 PM EST
Alternatively...
- (pwhysall)
- Dec. 8, 2003, 03:11:38 AM EST
So if Darrell's gang use W2K or later, they could try my way
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- Dec. 8, 2003, 03:18:19 AM EST
update
- (SpiceWare)
- Dec. 8, 2003, 10:00:34 AM EST
Re: NET SEND to all except a few systems?
- (qstephens)
- (32)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 10:30:25 AM EST
ROFL
- (deSitter)
- (31)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 11:47:06 AM EST
It inspires me
- (orion)
- (30)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 11:50:45 AM EST
Re: It inspires me
- (deSitter)
- (22)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 12:11:51 PM EST
On this we agree
- (orion)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 03:23:51 PM EST
Windows has no user context?
- (Arkadiy)
- (20)
- Jan. 2, 2004, 06:38:33 PM EST
process-level user context
- (deSitter)
- (19)
- Jan. 2, 2004, 07:53:05 PM EST
I am still at a loss as to what you mean
-NT
- (Arkadiy)
- (18)
- Jan. 2, 2004, 10:22:02 PM EST
A login is a profile
- (orion)
- Jan. 2, 2004, 11:36:02 PM EST
Re: I am still at a loss as to what you mean
- (deSitter)
- (16)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 12:02:12 AM EST
You're much mistaken
- (Arkadiy)
- (15)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 04:05:28 PM EST
Can you be logged in as two people at once?
- (ben_tilly)
- (7)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 05:09:19 PM EST
Not log in, no.
- (admin)
- (3)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 05:13:05 PM EST
I'll tuck that away in case I ever need it
-NT
- (ben_tilly)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 07:33:08 PM EST
Yes you can and it is a weak security system
- (orion)
- (1)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 08:10:23 PM EST
Re: Yes you can and it is a weak security system
- (pwhysall)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 11:54:08 PM EST
Certainly
- (Arkadiy)
- (2)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:10:45 PM EST
Re: Certainly
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:57:05 PM EST
You keep hearing yourself, not me
- (Arkadiy)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 08:35:49 PM EST
Re: You're much mistaken
- (deSitter)
- (6)
- Jan. 3, 2004, 09:28:42 PM EST
What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it?
- (Arkadiy)
- (5)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:14:02 PM EST
Re: What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it?
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 12:54:51 PM EST
I am not sure what NT_AUTHORITY is
- (Arkadiy)
- (3)
- Jan. 4, 2004, 08:42:31 PM EST
Except:
- (FuManChu)
- (2)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 01:55:07 AM EST
RIght you are
-NT
- (Arkadiy)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EST
Bottom line
- (pwhysall)
- Jan. 5, 2004, 07:20:06 AM EST
Careful there . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (5)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 12:31:49 PM EST
Does it really?
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 01:53:29 PM EST
I don't remember all the details . . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 02:23:54 PM EST
The licenses are more forgiving than you think
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 02:48:58 PM EST
Really interesting issue
- (orion)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 03:27:39 PM EST
Bah! I'll make it freeware then.
- (orion)
- Jan. 1, 2004, 02:07:29 PM EST
that's what I did
- (SpiceWare)
- Jan. 2, 2004, 12:36:33 PM EST