Re: How far should we go?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #12,963 by pdmoderator 10/11/01 3:30:55 PM Reply	Re: How far should we go? "At all costs" is pretty extreme. I don't think anyone wants to pay the cost of, say, destroying one of the lawfully constituted nations who are fighting the terrorist networks, such as ourselves. Could happen, if someone starts blowing off nukes. - pdmoderator
Post #12,964 by Silverlock 10/11/01 3:36:09 PM Reply	Re: At all costs Reminds of the story about the dog with a flea problem. You want to insure you kill the fleas? Set the dog on fire. You get a dead dog, but who cares? The fleas are dead. For every human problem, there is a neat, simple solution; and it is always wrong H. L. Mencken, Mencken's Metalaw

How far should we go? - (marlowe) - (11) - Oct. 11, 2001, 03:04:06 PM EDT

The importance of following through. - (marlowe) - Oct. 11, 2001, 03:08:04 PM EDT

Unconditional surrender - (marlowe) - Oct. 11, 2001, 03:17:20 PM EDT

Re: How far should we go? - (pdmoderator) - (1) - Oct. 11, 2001, 03:30:55 PM EDT

Re: At all costs - (Silverlock) - Oct. 11, 2001, 03:36:09 PM EDT

The case for colonization (and against proxies, by the way) - (marlowe) - (2) - Oct. 11, 2001, 05:37:21 PM EDT

Er, National Post by chance? - (Another Scott) - Oct. 11, 2001, 05:26:24 PM EDT

Good one, Marlowe - (Ashton) - Oct. 11, 2001, 05:30:51 PM EDT

Picking up the ball again in Iraq - (marlowe) - (3) - Oct. 12, 2001, 03:02:58 PM EDT

Re: Picking up thje ball again in Iraq - (addison) - (2) - Oct. 12, 2001, 01:01:25 PM EDT

The alternative to taking them all on... - (marlowe) - (1) - Oct. 12, 2001, 02:01:59 PM EDT

There are lots more alternatives. - (addison) - Oct. 12, 2001, 03:24:41 PM EDT

The natural enemy of the tightrope walker is the common bee.
61 ms