IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New OK, so starting to form a distinction here...
Attributes as indexing (as cforde pointed out as well).
Regards,

-scott anderson
New Yeah, back to what he said again
Attributes as indexing to indicate, to the parser and the human reader, which object you're referring to. You can define in the DTD that each <atom> can only have one <name> element, can't you?
We have to fight the terrorists as if there were no rules and preserve our open society as if there were no terrorists. -- [link|http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/05/opinion/BIO-FRIEDMAN.html|Thomas Friedman]
     XML: Attributes vs. elements - (admin) - (17)
         Re: XML: Attributes vs. elements - (neelk) - (1)
             Keeping tools in mind... - (admin)
         One thought... - (ChrisR) - (8)
             Something else I noticed... - (admin) - (7)
                 Attributes implies (to me) an inherent property - (drewk) - (6)
                     Re: Attributes implies (to me) an inherent property - (admin) - (3)
                         Sodium. Glad to help. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                         Attribute - (cforde) - (1)
                             I'll agree with Carl here - (drewk)
                     Implies to Me - Design Idiocy - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Once again, don't pontificate... - (admin)
         Prefer elements over attributes - (dpeterson) - (2)
             OK, so starting to form a distinction here... - (admin) - (1)
                 Yeah, back to what he said again - (drewk)
         My rule of thumb - (tuberculosis) - (2)
             Ah, nicely succinct. Thanks. -NT - (admin)
             Snort - (deSitter)

That's right subspace ponies! I'm makin' gravy without the lumps!
144 ms