IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Why 20"?
1) 10 cm = 4 inches :)

2) The Hubble would not work if pointed at Earth. It's extremely sensitive to infrared radiation. Plus differential heating would ruin the performance.

3) 20in is a *big* telescope. I'm assuming military satellites use Maksutov-type closed-end optics. Putting up, say, a 40in telescope would be an enormous undertaking on the level of the Hubble scope. I doubt a corrector plate that big, that did not go geometrically apeshit when moving in and out of the Earth's shadow, could be made.
-drl
New So don't go in the Earth's shadow
A polar orbit covers the whole Earth eventually, and keeps you in a constant orientation vs the Sun.

Cheers,
Ben
"good ideas and bad code build communities, the other three combinations do not"
- [link|http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2000-October/003023.html|Stefano Mazzocchi]
New Is that a technical term?
... go geometrically apeshit ...
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     An indication of how powerful US orbiting space cameras are - (dmarker) - (12)
         I'm sure the stuff they don't let you see . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         Damn, Hexixincun is about 6 kilometer to the west.... - (Simon_Jester)
         Re: An indication of how powerful US orbiting space cameras - (deSitter) - (4)
             Why 20"? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 Re: Why 20"? - (deSitter) - (2)
                     So don't go in the Earth's shadow - (ben_tilly)
                     Is that a technical term? - (drewk)
         And they're unmanned! - (marlowe) - (4)
             Actually it's not a NASA issue anymore anyway.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                 Now with Ruski engines... - (scoenye)
             Marlowe Behind Unmanning of Privates - (GBert) - (1)
                 The Nintendo Eloi are always with us.. -NT - (Ashton)

He’s big and he’s in the vomit!
46 ms