IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sent him a message
Found a typo.
Courts will rarely if even excuse a defendant from obligations


IMNSHO should be

Courts will rarely, if ever, excuse a defendant from obligations


Drew, IIRC, you're our resident "comma" checker. Did I punctuate it correctly?
"All men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field;
the grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of the Lord stands forever."
1 Peter 1:24-25
New That's how I'd have done it
Man, what a sad thing to be known for ...
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Well, I could have called you
our resident Commaentarist. How's that for an new word?

Actually, your punctuation rules parallel mine. (Please do let me know when I've screwed up, except in cases as below)

Every so often, I need to have a sanity check. I aint a perfeckionist, butt I hates it when your always getting with like reely bad punktuation and speling.
"All men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field;
the grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of the Lord stands forever."
1 Peter 1:24-25
New All you need is Strunk and White, and the AP Styleguide
That's pretty much what I do.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New And received a reply!
The newest posting has an interesting paragraph... It refers to SCO
Oh. It sued IBM. But, that does not mean that SCO thinks it has a case that can stick against IBM either. It may only mean that they (SCO) thinks that IBM will settle for money and SCO never will have to prove any IP claims. If you do not have to prove them, you do not have to have them. At least in theory anyway. And, of course the plan by SCO was to extort money from as many Linux customers as possible (again, without showing any proof). And, of course the plan by SCO was to harm Red Hat's business and reputation so much as to cause them to pressure IBM to clear it up. So you have the attack upon Red Hat. And, you have an attack upon Linux customers. And, it is all an illegal effort to cause enough harm to force IBM to pay up or settle way short of any requirement on SCO's part to prove in a court of law any of its rights (IP or other) have been violated. Thus you have SCO asking the court NOT to accept a case that would require SCO to prove their claims or as I put it (since they, SCO are a**h****) "shut the f*** up".

Very unlawyerlike.
"All men are like grass, and all their glory is like the flowers of the field;
the grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of the Lord stands forever."
1 Peter 1:24-25
Expand Edited by jbrabeck Oct. 1, 2003, 01:15:35 PM EDT
New DrooK? Hah! That's MY job!
In Finnish, BTW, the colloquial for "pedant" is "pilkunnussija" -- lit. "comma-fucker"...


   [link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Resident zIWETHEY pilkunnussija
New Nah, I'm more efficient
While you're busily telling someone what an ass they are not to know their own language at least as well as someone who's speaking it as his third (fourth?) I'm off grammar checking the next three paragraphs. :-D
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
     Hey! it's our old pal Lewis A. Mettler Esq . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (22)
         Does he know about here? - (deSitter) - (14)
             It could be my twitchy memory... - (hnick) - (12)
                 A little disagreement here . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
                     Our experiences differ - (hnick) - (7)
                         I'd be surprised. - (admin) - (2)
                             Re: I'd be surprised. - (deSitter) - (1)
                                 It is CO2, that's what the anti-Mosquito devices use. - (mmoffitt)
                         Here's what you need: - (jb4)
                         Zappers - (kmself) - (2)
                             A major problem is . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                 Ahhh... I know why... - (folkert)
                 ICLRPD - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                     Re: ICLRPD - (Nightowl)
                     ICLRPD (new thread) - (inthane-chan)
             Let's not. -NT - (imric)
         Sent him a message - (jbrabeck) - (6)
             That's how I'd have done it - (drewk) - (2)
                 Well, I could have called you - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                     All you need is Strunk and White, and the AP Styleguide - (drewk)
             And received a reply! - (jbrabeck)
             DrooK? Hah! That's MY job! - (CRConrad) - (1)
                 Nah, I'm more efficient - (drewk)

There will be no disappointment.
55 ms