IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: <grin> and they say...
Thank you very much. BTW: $30 price per barrel of crude increase.

Now what do you do?


Suck it up, drill more Alaskan wells, and build more nuclear power plants. (Which we should be doing anyway, but that's almost beside the point.)

I'd almost rather negotiate with a declared enemy than a wishy-washy ally. What's the Biblical verse about lukewarm? Ye are neither hot nor cold and I will spew thee out of my mouth (or something to that effect.)
Who knows how empty the sky is
In the place of a fallen tower.
Who knows how quiet it is in the home
Where a son has not returned.

-- Anna Akhmatova (1889-1966)
New I hear ya.
But building nuke plants and drilling oil wells are gonna take time. And, while it solves our problems, it won't solve Japan's, GB, etc. Like it or not, the Saudia's can use their oil as a club to bash our coalition.

And, we're still ignoring the base problem, why the Saudia's are "willywashy" in the first place.
New Why wishywashy?
They're willing to let us station troops for their defense on their soil.

They're not willing to let us use their soil for air strikes or invasions into Afghanistan. Sounds wishy-washy to me.
Who knows how empty the sky is
In the place of a fallen tower.
Who knows how quiet it is in the home
Where a son has not returned.

-- Anna Akhmatova (1889-1966)
     Coalition blues - (marlowe) - (25)
         I completely agree -NT - (drewk)
         Attacks called off to appease locals. - (marlowe) - (15)
             There are some good CR words to apply - (wharris2) - (12)
                 <grin> and they say... - (Simon_Jester) - (11)
                     Re: <grin> and they say... - (wharris2) - (2)
                         I hear ya. - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                             Why wishywashy? - (wharris2)
                     Of course, Saudi Arabia would be the easiest . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                         It would be *GOOD* for us next to do something - (Ashton)
                         Re: Of course, Saudi Arabia would be the easiest . . - (dmarker2) - (3)
                             I agree - (Steven A S) - (2)
                                 Not such a bad idea - (rsf) - (1)
                                     It might also extend who the enemy is. - (marlowe)
                     They need the oil money as much as the West needs the oil - (bluke) - (1)
                         And vice versa. - (marlowe)
             Disappointing to say the least - (rsf)
             Re: Attacks called off to appease locals. - (gtall)
         The price of Russia's cooperation - (marlowe)
         Egypt and Saudi Arabia finally come around again - (marlowe) - (1)
             I think this latest speech from bin Ladin's group . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         Saudi Arabia: a friend in need - (marlowe)
         How to run a coalition - (marlowe)
         Qatar is not on board - (marlowe) - (2)
             IIRC, Qatar was financial backer for al Jazeera, - (Ashton)
             Don't listen to what anyone over there says. - (Andrew Grygus)

"Knowledge is power." - France is bacon.
131 ms