IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Minor nit...
..is that there is still a "colonial power" operating in the region...and that would be Israel.

In fact...its one of the principle reasons for the violence today.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New How is Israel a colonial power?
The Jews have had a continous presence (at times small) since the destruction of the temple unil now. The archeological and historical facts undeniably tie the Jews to the land. Jews have been praying since the destruction of the temple in 70 CE) to return to their land.
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 20, 2003, 09:01:51 AM EDT
New Fifty years vs. nineteen hundred and thirty years
Which one of those was ancient history again?

The way I see it, Israel has a major problem; their economy is dependent on cheap Palestinian labour; without it, their economy will go tits up, so they have to let them in. That's the real reason they can't stop the suicide bombings; it's impossible to tell bombers from workers with 100% reliability.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Not really
The Palestinians need the jobs more then Israel needs them. It is the US, EU, etc. who are constantly pressuring Israel to let Palestinian workers in because otherwise they have nowhere to work.

New So why don't they stop them coming in?
Or is the fact that the US puts pressure on considering that the US gives more than a billion a year to Israel have a lot more to do with it?

What would the economy in Israel be like without foreign aid and Palestinian labour?
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New Because the US and the EU want them to let them in
The US influence is not really an issue of money. The money that the US gives to Israel is a very small percentage of the budget and in fact most if it has to be spent in the US. The primary benificiary of the aid money are US arms manufacturers. The US has tremendous influence because of it's role as the sole superpower in the world.
New Many countries have told the US to go stuff themselves
there's no reason Israel need be any different.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
New There certainly is
There is no other country that is under attack at the UN like Israel. I forget the number, buit a huge percentage of UN resolutions are against Israel. Israel needs the US on the security council.
New Why are the resolutions being passed?
Ask yourselves that. And "wah wah we're Jewish so everyone hates us the bastard nazi thugs!" isn't the answer.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New For one, anti-smeitism definately plays a role
secondly there are 22 Arab countries, a whole bunch of non-Arab muslim countries, and a whole bunch of countries dependent on Arab oil.

Whatever you think about Israel it should be clear to any thinking person that Israel is not the problem in the world. Yet from the number of UN resolutions it certainly looks that way. Even Kofi Anan has admitted that the UN has been anit-Israel.
The 2002 Durban Anti-RAcism conference is a perfect example. Israel is clearly not the most racist country in the world and neither is it a big source of racism, yet Israel was the focus of the conference, what is your explanation?
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 22, 2003, 12:22:56 AM EDT
New Cough...no argument there

The money that the US gives to Israel is a very small percentage of the budget and in fact most if it has to be spent in the US. The primary benificiary of the aid money are US arms manufacturers.


Best possible way for US Politicians to get graft to Defense Contractors - give US billions to another country and then demand that other country spend said billions buying US Defense contracts.

Quick question - is it good for Israel in the long run?

I know it's not good for the US in the long run.
New No it's not
and a number of prominent people in Israel have said it. However, it is hard to implement.
New Most of the current violence...
...centers around land...taken by force...and being "settled" by Jews. It was not land granted by the original charter nor is it land granted to them by God since the dawn of recorded civilization. The 1947 charter had the strip and included territories as land that was to become an independent arab state.

I forgot that the other colonial power in the region is the US...but they are occupied on the other coast at the moment.
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Not correct
The 1947 resolution was rejected by the Arabs and in any case was only advisory. In fact the only international agreement with any standing regarding the West Bank and Gaza is the 1922 San Remo conference agreement which gives the Jews the explicit permission to settle all over Palestine including the West Bank and Gaza. See my post [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=114717|here] for some links relating to this.
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 10:19:28 AM EDT
New Also
There are reasonable grounds that Britain and Franch double-crossed the Arabs in 1947/8.

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Of course, blame the Jews
It amazes me how Israel is blamed for the all of the ill's of the region. Is it Israel's fault that Saddam invaded Kuwait? Or even the fact that Saddam was in power? Is it Israel's fault that all 22 Arab countries are corrupt dictatorships? Did Israel put Assad in power? Is Israel somehow holding Egypt back? Is Israel somehow preventing the Saudi's from opening up their society? Why is it that Israel with all of the war's has managed to build a modern society with a GDP of $17,000, while absorbing millions of Jewish refugees on a tiny sliver of land with no resources and the arabs have not?

Israel is a great scapegoat for the Arab world. The Arab world somehow justifies all kinds of things because of Israel, for example martial law in Syria.
New Lesse...
It amazes me how Israel is blamed for the all of the ill's of the region. Is it Israel's fault that Saddam invaded Kuwait?
No...but what does that have to do with a) my post and b) bus bombs in Tel Aviv?

Or even the fact that Saddam was in power?
see above

Is it Israel's fault that all 22 Arab countries are corrupt dictatorships?
Nope

Did Israel put Assad in power?
Nope

Is Israel somehow holding Egypt back?
Nope

Is Israel somehow preventing the Saudi's from opening up their society?
Nope

Why is it that Israel with all of the war's has managed to build a modern society with a GDP of $17,000, while absorbing millions of Jewish refugees on a tiny sliver of land with no resources and the arabs have not?
Becasue they are better at applying the billions in aid to productive use than the arabs are at spending their oil money...maybe?

Israel is a great scapegoat for the Arab world. The Arab world somehow justifies all kinds of things because of Israel, for example martial law in Syria.
The arab world might do this...but I didn't. 2 decades of terrorism against Israel over a 10 mile wide strip of beach that was supposed to be an independent state. Hell...every US major city has its slum right next door...outside of its jursidiction...NY has Newark...Philly has Camden, St Louis has East St Louis etc...cut'em loose ferchrissakes...its more trouble than its worth.

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Barak offered more at Camp David in 2000 ...
and look what the answer was. In truth most people in Israel would have no problem with getting rid of the Gaza Strip. However, it would not solve the problem. The Arabs want everything. Nabil Shaath an important minister in the PA stated over the weekend in a speech that of course the Palestinian refugees will be returning to Haifa, Jaffa, etc. They want their own Palestinian state with 0 Jews and then they want to innundate the Jewish state with 3 million Arabs. Their are already 22 Arab states with 99% of the land, do they really need a 23rd state. In addition, the British already created a Palestinian state on 80% of Palestine Jordan.

In addition, Hebron, Jerusalem and the other cities in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) are historic Israel. Jerusalem is where the 2 temples stood, Hebron is where Abraham Issac and Jacob are buried, Nablus, Joseph, Bethlehem, Rachel. These are cities with ancient Jewish conenctions.
New Apparently they do.
Becasue that 23rd state has been a demand for quite some time.

Nonsense to you? Oh well.

Sure there is more involved...rights of those who live and work in Israel, fate of the areas of religious significance in the West Bank...but this consistent stubborn attitude about settlements in gaza and the protection of these by violence against others...does NOT actually look like a willing stance in negotiations.

They kill someone, Isreal kills someone...the last few months have both sides pointing at the other and saying "they started it" like a bunch of schoolkids.

The Arab League >certainly< shoulders a certain amount of the blame here. But do you honestly expect them to try and solve >any< issue surrounding the creation of Israel?
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Where was that demand from 1948-1967?
Did anyone ask for or try to establish a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza when the Arabs ruled there? No! Who doesn't UN Resolution 242 (1967) talk about a Palestinian state? Because no one dreamed of it. It is only after Israel won the Six Day war which was brought on by the Arabs and the Yom Kippur War (1973) that suddenly the Arabs started demanding a Palestinain state. Here are some links to articles which explains the legal status of the West Bank and Gaza
[link|http://www.freeman.org/m_online/jun01/shusteff2.htm|THE MYTH OF "OCCUPIED" TERRITORIES]
[link|http://www.netanyahu.org/inlawreglano.html|THE INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDING THE LAND OF ISRAEL AND JERUSALEM ]
here is a link to the mandate itself [link|http://www.shalomjerusalem.com/jerusalem/jerusalem73g.html|1922 LEAGUE OF NATIONS MANDATE] in particular see article 6
" The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes. "

it is unfortunate that more people don't know these basic facts.

Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 09:48:32 AM EDT
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 10:03:56 AM EDT
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 10:17:12 AM EDT
New Prior to 1967
the west back and gaza were occupied by Egypt and Jordan.

After 67 Israel "posessed" the Sanai, Golan Heights, the west bank and Gaza.

So, you see, the "arabs" didn't need to ask for those areas to be controlled by arabs...because they >were<.

ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, BELGIUM, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, CANADA, CHILE, CHINA, COLOMBIA, CUBA, CZECHOSLOVAKIA, DENMARK, EL SALVADOR, FRANCE, GREECE, GUATEMALA, HAITI, HONDURAS, INDIA, ITALY, JAPAN, LIBERIA, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, NICARAGUA, NORWAY, PANAMA, PARAGUAY, PERSIA, PERU, POLAND, PORTUGAL, RUMANIA, SIAM, SPAIN, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, SOUTH AFRICA, UNITED KINGDOM, URUGUAY, VENEZUELA, YUGOSLAVIA, ALBANIA, AUSTRIA, BULGARIA, COSTA RICA, FINLAND, LUXEMBOURG, ESTONIA, LATVIA, LITHUANIA, HUNGARY

What is that you ask? Why its the membership of the league of nations in 1922. I don't notice anyone there even remotely located in the Middle East. Does it surprise you, then, that there is no recognition by these people of decisions made by these organizations?
If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New {cackle} Arabs must be slow.. in slogan-building
No Taxation Nation-creation Without Representation!

(Catch (19)22 - one must Be a Nation to request Admission or Protest same. Is the Planet unclear on the concept?)
New That would be a problem.
But the "nation" existed. Only the lines >we< recognize were not.

If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. Fudd's First Law of Opposition

[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
New Wait, you mean the Palestinians are just Arabs
If so they already have 22 countries. The West Bank and Gaza were controlled by Arabs but not Palestinians, rather Egypt and Jordan. If so why didn't the Palestinians (and the world) demand an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza from 1948-1967 instead of Jordanian and Egyptian rule? The fact is that no one suggested establishing a separate Palestinian state because there never has been one and there never was a separate Palestinian identity until the 1970's.

Regarding your second point, all of the Arab countries came into existence based on that same conference.
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 04:42:42 PM EDT
Expand Edited by bluke Aug. 21, 2003, 04:46:10 PM EDT
New If Israel did not exist,
it would have been invented. It's not a principal reason for violence, it's the main outlet for hatred. If it weren't there, some other outlets would have to be found. In fact, the hatred reaches such proportions that Israel is no longer sufficient to serve as the only outlet. US is getting some action. Indonesia. And now, even UN. I wonder how long before France feels the heat.
--

Less Is More. In my book, About Face, I introduce over 50 powerful design axioms. This is one of them.

--Alan Cooper. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
New It's not nice
to point out the rather mechanical stimulus/response behaviour of homo-saps: they imagine that they are sentient, and that there are Ponderous Reasons for behaving like stupid jerks.

(You aren't advocating introspection, now are you? ;-)
     Why are Africa and the Middle East in such bad shape? - (bluke) - (57)
         Nicely done. - (pwhysall) - (5)
             So you explain Africa ... - (bluke) - (4)
                 Re: So you explain Africa ... - (pwhysall) - (3)
                     So, the fact that the West ... - (bluke) - (2)
                         Re: So, the fact that the West ... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             in a sense the pigdogs *did* - (rcareaga)
         Because you are superstitious children - (deSitter) - (22)
             In other words ... - (bluke) - (21)
                 I wouldn't rule out the correlation - (deSitter) - (20)
                     When did the West really get the message? - (bluke) - (19)
                         The message was that of Jesus - (deSitter) - (18)
                             Tell me when it matured - (bluke) - (13)
                                 7/4/1776 -NT - (deSitter) - (11)
                                     When blacks were slaves??? - (bluke) - (10)
                                         Re: When blacks were slaves??? - (deSitter) - (5)
                                             If I understand you right - (bluke)
                                             Ah, they were shipping slaves because they vere Semitic. - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                                                 Re: Ah, they were shipping slaves because they vere Semitic. - (deSitter) - (1)
                                                     shun -NT - (Arkadiy)
                                                 He's not antisemitic, he's just on a roll - (boxley)
                                         I would choose Today's America - (orion) - (3)
                                             I would hope that most people here would - (bluke) - (2)
                                                 18th century America - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                     re your caveat.. - (Ashton)
                                 The Pledge of Allegiance is no longer required in schools (new thread) - (orion)
                             Love thy neighbor as thyself is not Jesus but the Bible -NT - (bluke) - (2)
                                 Wrong -NT - (deSitter) - (1)
                                     Leviticus 19:18 - (bluke)
                             Including 3/5ths of all Nigra's? -NT - (boxley)
         Minor nit... - (bepatient) - (25)
             How is Israel a colonial power? - (bluke) - (13)
                 Fifty years vs. nineteen hundred and thirty years - (jake123) - (9)
                     Not really - (bluke) - (8)
                         So why don't they stop them coming in? - (jake123) - (7)
                             Because the US and the EU want them to let them in - (bluke) - (6)
                                 Many countries have told the US to go stuff themselves - (jake123) - (3)
                                     There certainly is - (bluke) - (2)
                                         Why are the resolutions being passed? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                             For one, anti-smeitism definately plays a role - (bluke)
                                 Cough...no argument there - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
                                     No it's not - (bluke)
                 Most of the current violence... - (bepatient) - (2)
                     Not correct - (bluke)
                     Also - (static)
             Of course, blame the Jews - (bluke) - (8)
                 Lesse... - (bepatient) - (7)
                     Barak offered more at Camp David in 2000 ... - (bluke) - (6)
                         Apparently they do. - (bepatient) - (5)
                             Where was that demand from 1948-1967? - (bluke) - (4)
                                 Prior to 1967 - (bepatient) - (3)
                                     {cackle} Arabs must be slow.. in slogan-building - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         That would be a problem. - (bepatient)
                                     Wait, you mean the Palestinians are just Arabs - (bluke)
             If Israel did not exist, - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                 It's not nice - (Ashton)
         Re: Why are Africa and the Middle East in such bad shape? - (JvlivsCaesar) - (1)
             surviving in the arctic requires co-operation - (daemon)

Idle.
105 ms