Post #114,067
8/17/03 3:20:25 PM
|

It is almost Linux time
I went to Sam's the $72USD 80G drive was gone, but they had a $149USD 160G drive with an Ultra ATA controller. I talked my wife into buying it after we looked at prices at other places and they coudn't beat Sam's price.
So now I am going to back up all my data and files I need and start over again. 160G is a lot of space.
Why I could run both Red Hat and Debian Linux on the same drive, just different partitions. Can they share a swap partition?
I got OS/2 Warp 3.0, I could even install that now. Provided I find the right drivers for it and can get a TCP/IP stack going.
So I'll be downloading Linux install CDs, and Open Office, Mozilla, Evolution, WINE, XFree86, anything else I'll be needing?
Of course I'll have Windows 98 and XP Pro on different partitions as well.
I imagine to shuffle files with OS/2 that I'll need a FAT16 partition unless I can find a FAT32 or EXT2 driver for it?
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,073
8/17/03 4:00:37 PM
|

Re: It is almost Linux time
Why would you want Windows 98 when you have XP and plenty of space?
Why would you waste time with OS/2 3? If you really love that OS, then put it by itself on another box.
Yes you can share swap space between Linuxen.
Don't waste your time with Debian. MHO of course.
80 Windows on NTFS, 256M swap, 79 Linux. Since the disk is so enormous you don't need r/w access to the Windows partition. You can mount NTFS r/o.
-drl
|
Post #114,080
8/17/03 5:03:17 PM
|

Why Windows (new thread)
Created as new thread #114079 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=114079|Why Windows]
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,083
8/17/03 5:06:27 PM
|

Why OS/2? (new thread)
Created as new thread #114082 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=114082|Why OS/2?]
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,090
8/17/03 7:14:06 PM
|

Hard Drives larger than 137 Gigs and Linux
I opened it up, got a blue note saying that Windows (all versions) do not support hard drives above 137 Gigs without a special controller card and drivers. I got the Promise ATA100 TX2 PCI controller and driver disk, but no Linux or OS/2 drivers.
So does Linux support Mammoth Hard Drives over 137 Gigs? What if I cannot find a driver for this card? Would my ATA100 controller on my motherboard support the drive without the need of the PC controller? Or do I really need a special card to do that?
Basically I could be screwed out of installing Linux, unless the latest Linux distros support that card? Any ideas?
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,094
8/17/03 8:09:21 PM
|

Re: Hard Drives larger than 137 Gigs and Linux
You want to look at the [link|http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Large-Disk-HOWTO.html|Large Disk HOWTO] and the [link|http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Ultra-DMA.html|Ultra-DMA Mini-HOWTO]. I'm actually wrestling with a Promise card ATM. It works under Knoppix, but not with my 2.4.21 kernel. For reasons not entirely clear. I'll post resolution. \r\n\r\n Note too that I disagree wholly with Ross's comments regarding Debian, for reasons discussed previously in detail, mostly summarized in [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WhyDebianRocks|WhyDebianRocks]. In your case, an easier install might be a good way to get started -- Mandrake or SuSE. In the long run, Debian's maintenance wins. \r\n\r\n I'd also strongly suggest you not attempt a multi-boot install on this system. Too many things to go wrong. You may be able to change this after-the-fact. More advisable: dumpster-dive (or cruise flea markets, etc.) for old HW. Note that most of it's not worth the price at free, but you can find useful stuff out there.
--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #114,104
8/17/03 8:38:25 PM
|

Thanks for the info
I'll need Multi-Boot because I still need Windows, I cannot quit cold turkey. I need to develop ASP and VB apps to keep in practice and I need Access database [ractice as well.
LILO sounds complicated to get it to recognize large hard drives, but the Howto doesn't mention if GRUB is any easier or better to support large hard drives.
Debian is a bit confusing to me, I am not sure what disks I really need to download to install it. Downloading all the disks will take some time.
I might start out with Red Hat, since it can boot from the disk to install, unlike the Free SuSE version. My friend who is a local Linux expert supports Red Hat, so I can go to him for advice.
My ABit VH6-II Motherboard says it can do Ultra ATA100 with the built in IDE controllers, so do I really need that Promise card? I Googled the card and Linux and found people having a lot of issues with the Promise Ultra 100 TX2 card. Lockups, unable to access CD-Burner, etc.
Maybe I'll just install Windows for now, read up on the Howtos to figure out how Linux can work with the larger hard drives and install later.
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,147
8/17/03 11:37:27 PM
|

Excuses
\r\nI'll need Multi-Boot because I still need Windows, I cannot quit cold turkey.\r\nI need to develop ASP and VB apps to keep in practice and I need Access\r\ndatabase practice as well.\r\n \r\n\r\n You're making excuses. This is the first of six. \r\n\r\n If this whole situation is too overwhelming for you, if you can't\r\nmake up your own mind about what to do, if you're not willing to do some\r\nlegwork, don't fucking bother. It's not worth it Norm. Not for you.\r\nNot for us. Just don't complain that the way things are sucks, because\r\nyou'll have to change for it to do so. \r\n\r\n I take it you've currently got a system with legacy MS Windows\r\nrunning on it. Either continue to use it, or use this as the first\r\ndrive on your new system. If you must dual-boot, it's far easier to do\r\nit with HDs dedicated to each system. legacy MS Windows has a bad habit\r\nof mistreating coexisting systems, and has severe restrictions as to how\r\nit can be installed (first partition of first IDE drive, typically). \r\n\r\n By insisting on a dual boot, you're creating the following problems\r\nfor yourself: \r\n\r\n \r\n- Installing and configuring a new HD.
\r\n- Installing and configuring legacy MS Windows on the system.
\r\n- Installing and configuring GNU/Linux on the system.
\r\n- Installing and configuring other OS(s) on the system.
\r\n- Configuring one or more boot managers.
\r\n- Fixing problems caused by boot manages and/or OSs as a result.
\r\n- Constantly booting between systems.
\r\n \r\n\r\n By contrast, installing a drive on a new system and booting the\r\ncomputer is a rather simpler problem. Note too that you can\r\nbuy a full, if not top-of-the-line, computer for little\r\nmore than the $167 you've spent on the drive, and less than the $210\r\nyou've spent on the drive + Promise ATA card, plus tax, cables,\r\nmountkits, etc. \r\n\r\n \r\nLILO sounds complicated to get it to recognize large hard drives, but the\r\nHowto doesn't mention if GRUB is any easier or better to support large hard\r\ndrives.\r\n \r\n\r\n If you're going to whinge about LILO and GRUB, don't even try this,\r\nNorm. For your sake and ours. \r\n\r\n \r\nDebian is a bit confusing to me, I am not sure what disks I really need to\r\ndownload to install it. Downloading all the disks will take some time.\r\n \r\n\r\n Read the fucking documentation. Information on getting Debian is [link|http://www.debian.org/distrib/|here]. If you can't decide for\r\nyourself whether buying (or having someone ship you -- as I know has\r\nbeen both offered and done) install disks, using a network install, or\r\nbuying a preconfigured system best fits your needs, again, don't even\r\nfucking bother. We don't need it. Neither do you. \r\n\r\n \r\nI might start out with Red Hat, since it can boot from the disk to install,\r\nunlike the Free SuSE version. My friend who is a local Linux expert supports\r\nRed Hat, so I can go to him for advice.\r\n \r\n\r\n The good news is that [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/Main/DebianChrootInstall|Red Hat makes a\r\nsurprisingly good Debian installer]. Other than that, I cannot\r\nrecommend it. Note that access to RH updates in the future looks\r\nquestionable. \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\nMy ABit VH6-II Motherboard says it can do Ultra ATA100 with the built in IDE\r\ncontrollers, so do I really need that Promise card? I Googled the card and\r\nLinux and found people having a lot of issues with the Promise Ultra 100 TX2\r\ncard. Lockups, unable to access CD-Burner, etc.\r\n \r\n\r\n Here's how you assess something like this: \r\n\r\n \r\n- Try it without the Promise card.
\r\n- If that doesn't work, try it with the Promise card.
\r\n- Post any followup questions here.
\r\n- Make up your own fucking mind.
\r\n \r\n\r\n Again, if you can't cope with this, don't bother. \r\n\r\n \r\nMaybe I'll just install Windows for now, read up on the Howtos to figure out\r\nhow Linux can work with the larger hard drives and install later.\r\n \r\n\r\n Maybe, just maybe, Norm is just fine the way he is, and he doesn't\r\nhave to change. Give that a shot, Norm, but don't bitch if the scenery\r\nis always the same. \r\n
--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #114,170
8/18/03 8:44:58 AM
|

I've never had a problem
resizing HDDs and installing Linux - only problems when installing Windows AFTER Linux (or OS/2, for that matter)
Indeed, Wine really works well when it's set up to use the actual Windows install - and what few Win32 apps I play with anymore are generally run through Wine...
Imric's Tips for Living
- Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
- Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
- Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
|
Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning, As hopeless as it seems in the middle, Or as finished as it seems in the end.
|
|
Post #114,173
8/18/03 9:23:17 AM
|

Not worth the time Karsten.
I sent Norm Debian 3.0r1 CDS all tested on a really crappy OLD CD reader... this ensures that they were good CD-ROMs I also verified the media.
I also sent Norm, sundry of Windows Util including Cygwin, Mozilla, blah...
I also sent Norm, RedHat 8.0 CDs verified they worked using that SAME CRAPPY CD-Reader. I used them to install a scratch machine,
I also sent Norm, Mandrake 9.0 CDs verified by this same CD-Reader.
Trust me, this CD-READER is so Damn Picky, it there is One scratch on a "commercial" CD it will skip or have reading errors.
I also verified all of them on 6 other CD Readers of various ages... not including the old Mitsumi Drives that ran off the Sound Blaster Cards. Mainly because I couldn't even get it to read an 80Min CD.
GRUB. Only way to go. [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/HowToInstallKnoppix|SEE HERE] and [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=97405|SEE HERE]
Get on without trying to fix his Linux problems. he has proven before, and will again he just want to get us fomenting about him again.
I'd also resond to him directly by showing him his solution (or lack there of) by re-directing Norm (and for laughs you others) [link|http://www.iwethey.org/zerror.html|HERE]
TTFN.
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]
The Green Paint on the Walls Clouds my Thoughts of Flying Planks of Wood, Much Like the Elephant Impaled on the Hood of a Lincoln Town Car. Blood Covers One, Paint the Other, and Love Covers You.
|
Post #114,181
8/18/03 11:49:17 AM
|

What happened with the CDRs you sent me
They didn't work on my spare system, but worked on a Virtual PC session on my main machine. My spare system must have had bad hardware because eventually the motherboard went out. VPC was only a trial and I needed the hard drive space so I removed it from my main system.
But now I got boatloads of hard drive space on my main system, but I am being discouraged from doing a Multi-Boot.
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,198
8/18/03 2:45:56 PM
|

No...
No you aren't being discouraged. They are talking "above you". Karsten gave you many good links and ideas. Shake what your mother gave you, and read and DO. Remember: There is no spoon!
-- [link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg], [link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
You turn the atmosphere wild with currents of vitriol when you smile at the passing insects.
|
Post #114,219
8/18/03 6:02:04 PM
|

There is no Spoon
Ok, first things first. Windows has to be installed before Linux, or else it may mess up the Linux partition and mess up LILO or GRUB.
First thing I did was update my ABit VH6-II BIOS to Ver 7F for large HD support. Onboard Ultra ATA100 Controller works fine now, sees all 160Gigs in CMOS setup.
I tried Win98 FDISK, it reported 21Gigs, I tried XP setup, it reported 137Gigs. Bah! I finally went and used the WD Data Lifeguard Tools and formatted and partitioned it with that. I made the reserved Linux partitions "FAT32" for now, I figure CFDISK can change them later or the Linux setup can if I keep them empty.
Win98 install is going fine, XP Pro will be later, and then OS/2, and then Red Hat and maybe Debian. After I read the Howtos Karsten kindly pointed me to, that is. :)
I am posting this from a spare machine that wouldn't take Linux, but would take Windows. This one locked up in the middle of a Red Hat install, the other one had media errors but the motherboard eventually went bad (I'm thinking the IDE controllers were failing, hence the Media Errors?).
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,233
8/18/03 7:43:12 PM
|

Making progress -- Win98 large disk support, etc.
OK, Norm, you're making progress, which is commendable. Focus on the\r\ntask and the solution. \r\n\r\n \r\nOk, first things first. Windows has to be installed before Linux, or\r\nelse it may mess up the Linux partition and mess up LILO or GRUB.\r\n \r\n\r\n Well, if you're going to insist on multi-boot, yes. IIRC, it's\r\nWin9x or ME, then NT/2K/XP, then GNU/Linux, if these are the platforms\r\nyou're planning on running. \r\n\r\n \r\nFirst thing I did was update my ABit VH6-II BIOS to Ver 7F for large HD\r\nsupport. Onboard Ultra ATA100 Controller works fine now, sees all\r\n160Gigs in CMOS setup.\r\n \r\n\r\n This should be sufficient. Since the controller's UDMA, you should\r\nsee the disk's full performance as well. This is based on my\r\nunderstanding of the whole current IDE/ATA drive technology, which is\r\nsketchy at best (both my understanding, and the technology). \r\n\r\n \r\nI tried Win98 FDISK, it reported 21Gigs, \r\n \r\n\r\n Known issue. Remember: once you're past 2 GiB, or hell, 512 MiB,\r\nyou're into the patch and band-aid school of PC technology. Standard\r\n"barriers" are: 512 MiB, 2.1 GiB, 3.2 GiB, 4.2 GiB, 7.9 GiB, 33.8 GiB,\r\nand 167 GiB, or thereabouts (most of this from the GNU/Linux Large Disk\r\nHOWTO). In the case of Win98, see this KB article: [link|http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/Q243/4/50.ASP&NoWebContent=1|ScanDisk\r\nErrors on IDE Hard Disks Larger Than 32 GiB]. Your use of 3rd party\r\nutilities is probably the Right Thing[tm]. \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\nI tried XP setup, it reported\r\n137Gigs. Bah! I finally went and used the WD Data Lifeguard Tools and\r\nformatted and partitioned it with that. I made the reserved Linux\r\npartitions "FAT32" for now, I figure CFDISK can change them later or the\r\nLinux setup can if I keep them empty.\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\nWin98 install is going fine, XP Pro will be later, and then OS /2, and\r\nthen Red Hat and maybe Debian. After I read the Howtos Karsten kindly\r\npointed me to, that is. :)\r\n \r\n\r\n You're welcome ;-) \r\n\r\n \r\nI am posting this from a spare machine that wouldn't take Linux, but\r\nwould take Windows. This one locked up in the middle of a Red Hat\r\ninstall, the other one had media errors but the motherboard eventually\r\nwent bad (I'm thinking the IDE controllers were failing, hence the Media\r\nErrors?).\r\n \r\n\r\n Any reason this system can't remain your dedicated legacy MS Windows\r\nsystem? My experience is that it is far better to keep separate systems\r\nfor separate OSs rather than to dual-boot them. [link|http://www.tightvnc.com/|TightVNC] (Free Software) makes\r\nremote-accessing pretty much anything a snap. \r\n
--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #114,235
8/18/03 7:48:32 PM
|

Legacy MS system
It only has a 166Mhz Pentium 1 CPU, which would have been good enough to run Linux but with Windows it kind of is a slow-poke.
My main system is a 700Mhz Celeron with 128M of RAM, a doorstop by today's standards but good enough to run what I want so far.
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #114,203
8/18/03 3:33:09 PM
|

Web server as Jewish grandmother?
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #114,149
8/17/03 11:51:55 PM
|

Re: Thanks for the info
There is nothing to installing a modern Linux version. It's afterward that needs attention. Like I said, stay away from Debian.
LILO will be fine if the machine is even remotely modern (BIOS wise).
Don't whine if it isn't - GRUB sucks beyond speeching (it's a pre-OS) but it will probably work.
-drl
|
Post #114,171
8/18/03 8:47:44 AM
|

But Debian rocks post-installation!
Imric's Tips for Living
- Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
- Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
- Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
|
Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning, As hopeless as it seems in the middle, Or as finished as it seems in the end.
|
|
Post #114,176
8/18/03 10:36:50 AM
8/18/03 12:11:19 PM
|

Hey...
I'm no Linux God and I managed to get Debian installed. Heck, I now even have it running on an Brand New Compaq S4000XN 2.4ghz Celeron, with a Brookdale chip set.
I did have to build the experimental XFree86, but I'm not complaining because it cost me about $2 in media costs to burn it to CD. Greg, Karsten, Wade, Imric, Rick, scoenye, Peter, etc. are freakin' geniuses! (I know I'm missing someone here.) But, also, I DO make the effort, I don't just sit and whine about not being able to do it. (At least I hope I don't.)
I'm OK too, but I'm more database and more of a technology generalist. If you want to talk Java, C++, middleware, business applications, then I can contribute something. But installing Linux, well, I just muddle through it.
Glen Austin

Edited by gdaustin
Aug. 18, 2003, 12:10:36 PM EDT

Edited by gdaustin
Aug. 18, 2003, 12:11:19 PM EDT
|
Post #114,137
8/17/03 10:48:07 PM
|

OK, just got the Promise PDC20268 working w/ 2.4.21
Changes required: \r\n\r\n \r\n- Get the I/O values for the card (see the Ultra DMA HOWTO above). Get these with: grep -A 10 'Promise Technology' /proc/pci | grep 'I/O' | awk '{print $3}'.
\r\n- Add these values to your bootloader. Examples (your I/Os will vary). In LILO, eg: append="ide2=0xb400,0xb002 ide3=0xa800,0xa402", in GRUB, on the kernel line: ide2=0xb400,0xb002 ide3=0xa800,0xa402. SEE THE HOWTO FOR THE PROPER VALUES. REPEAT: SEE THE HOWTO FOR THE PROPER VALUES.
\r\n- Add the kernel module to /etc/modules: echo pdc202xx_new >> /etc/modules
\r\n- Reboot.
\r\n \r\n\r\n Much happiness. I've got /home and 74 GiB of free storage ;-)
--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #114,096
8/17/03 8:18:43 PM
|

Re: Hard Drives larger than 137 Gigs and Linux
NTFS supports volumes of up to 18 Petabytes.
Linux ext2 currently supports filesystems of up to 2TB in size; however, expect this to rise sharply with the advent of 64-bit Linux on Opteron and Itanium.
Both will happily cope with your relatively titchy 160GB disk quite happily.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #114,101
8/17/03 8:30:48 PM
|

Filesystems, sure, but...
...problem is BIOSes originally topping at 512 MB disk support.
--\r\n Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]\r\n [link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]\r\n What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?\r\n [link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.\r\n \r\n Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.\r\n[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html]\r\n
|
Post #114,102
8/17/03 8:32:12 PM
|

That's long since dead
That problem had largely gone away by the time the first Pentium machines arrived.
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #114,118
8/17/03 9:27:02 PM
|

Not just bios, IDE design evils
The problem with the large disks is the evil hack they did to add lba48 (i.e. >137GB) addressing to IDE drives. If the IDE driver doesn't handle it right it corrupts everything by reading or writing the wrong sectors.
The lba48 hack is a testament to the corner cutting the IDE drive makers do. In lba48 mode, the driver writes 24 bits of the address to a set of registers. It then writes the last 24 bits to the same registers. So if the driver botches the lba48 setup or the double write for the address, your large disk just got crap scribbled who knows where. The scsi command set can be insane in its complexity, but IDE is crazy in its hack on top of a cludge design.
I'm not sure how complete the lba48 support is in the different linux kernels. I don't have such disks so I haven't kept up.
David "LordBeatnik"
|
Post #114,108
8/17/03 9:00:18 PM
|

Re: Hard Drives larger than 137 Gigs and Linux
The Promise controllers are listed as supported by OS/2 on [link|http://www.os2warp.be/index2.php?pageid=7&sub=4|Warp Compatible Hardware]. You're going to need at least the NewDASD drivers available from [link|http://www7.software.ibm.com/2bcprod.nsf|IBM]. You need to make a copy of the one of the startup disks and copy the new drivers to it. Don't know the exact details, I've only done it for Warp4, but instructions are in the NewDASD package.
You'll also probably want to update to something like FixPack 40 to bring Warp3 reasonably up to date.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #114,110
8/17/03 9:01:25 PM
|

Idle curiosity
Are IBM still issuing fixpacks for 3.0?
Peter [link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
|
Post #114,116
8/17/03 9:19:48 PM
|

I seem to remember they called it quits on 3.0 desktop . .
. . at least a year ago, but I'm not sure. I dealt with 3.0 for only a few months before moving (myself and clients) to 4.0, and haven't watched it closely. WarpServer 3.0 is still supported (and supports the Warp 4 desktop).
I understand they've told the banks support for 4.0 will end in 2006, but they may have to back off because the bank transition from OS/2 to Linux isn't going well. Many banks are opting for Windows instead because ATM makers are going to Windows. NCR is already Windows, but Dibold is still on OS/2 and doesn't know when they might change.
Of course eComStation (Serenity) has a charter to continue OS/2 devlopment.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #114,126
8/17/03 9:56:32 PM
|

There is a fixpack 43 now
but you have to subscribe to software choice to get it. Basically there for customers running warp 3 in embedded roles that don't want to change... buying the software updates package is still cheaper for some people than transitioning to a later version of OS/2, with concomitant retesting and rewrites.
There's also a fixpack 16 for warp 4, also only available via swc.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #114,129
8/17/03 10:11:16 PM
|

I stop at fixpack 12 for Warp 4 . .
. . because with 13 and on, and eCS, DOS performance goes completely to hell, without a fix that I know of. Since all the OS/2 installations I deal with (including mine) run a mix of OS/2 and very important DOS apps, this is a really, really big problem.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #114,202
8/18/03 3:27:46 PM
|

I dunno...
I have eCS, and I ran fp15 for a long time, and the dos apps I have run fine. Wish I knew why they were behaving so badly for you...
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #114,230
8/18/03 7:27:10 PM
|

Were you running . .
. . NetBEUI over TCP/IP? I haven't experimented with a stand-alone machine, perhaps I should just to see if that's why others report no problem. At two sites, with machines of various descriptions, we've had this problem. Fixpack through 12 work fine, anything beyond and DOS performance sucks rocks.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #114,425
8/19/03 9:50:05 PM
|

No, I'm not (new thread)
Created as new thread #114424 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=114424|No, I'm not]
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Post #114,154
8/18/03 12:32:35 AM
|

OS/2 and NewDASD drivers (new thread)
Created as new thread #114153 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=114153|OS/2 and NewDASD drivers]
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|
Post #116,381
9/2/03 6:09:21 PM
|

Ok, starting over
Using the WDC drive partitoning software may not have been the best idea. It made one primary partition and the rest extended partitions. Then later it reports a Drive I/O Timeout error. Diagnostics passes on the drive. no errors found.
Booted up Knoppix, ran CFDISK made three primary partitions, one for 98SE, one for XP Pro, and another for Linux. OS/2 is going to be installed on a spare system, it works with older hardware better anyway.
I am formatting the drives now. I talked to my local friend who is a Red Hat Linux expert, and he said it would be better this way. He also said to use GRUB for larger drives, LILO has issues that have to be overcome.
"Lady I only speak two languages, English and Bad English!" - Corbin Dallas "The Fifth Element"
|