just as they happen to be, and - from anything which might just prompt an uncomfortable review of same: it would be best not to choose a course which demands original thought. This is the choice which many make, as it avoids the unpleasantness of "internal conflict" and the difficulty of re-thinking one's former opinions on all things (like what 'Right' might mean? or say, what it feels like to discover that it might be harder to discern.. than one had supposed).
Well what's really funny here, is I was not concerned at all. Instead, when I mentioned the idea of the course to my counselor and my husband, both of them had the same reaction, "Do you really think you should take that class?"
I'm trying to figure out, I guess, why they feel that way, and yes, I asked, but the main thing they say is it might conflict with what I believe. But like I said, so did Evolution, no biggie there.
Sewing is good. 'Grief' seems apt to be about manipulating one's own psyche so as to deaden the pain of stark revelation of: actual Loss. This is also a popular approach to the unpleasant aspect of the gamut of human emotional response. About grief: in the healthy individual, it is experienced heavily and welcomed for its cathartic effect. In time, it fades. This is natural - do you really want to mess with altering the process?
Well, I can't sew to save my life. I actually sewed my project to myself (clothes) in Home Ec in High school. I sew the basics for necessity, but they look awful.
I thought about the Grief class because I just experienced Grief for the first time in it's full intensity. Unlike what you say, which is normal, "experienced heavily and welcomed etc..." I never did until this year. Grief never hit me for many days, months, even years after the person was dead. This was new.
If you are satisfied that you are in possession of The Truth about any of the complicated stuff - especially of the sort which prompts heated debates and such: why mess with Certainty? Choose comfort. This attitude is an essential-part of also feeling free later-on, to express one's Righteousness and join other like-minded ones, enjoying the warmth of consensus. (And excoriating the Heathens - this perk goes along with that nice warm Certainty)
Well, I considered the class because of the things we were posting in here, and the willingness to be open-minded to other's opinions and thoughts. I thought it kinda tied in nicely with all that. Nothing anyone can say will change my stances on right or wrong, I've pretty much grown into those beliefs and have no desire or need to change them, but I can learn how other people believe and not affect my own beliefs, or at least I think I could.
OTOH: conflict signals a situation in which there may seem.. to be more than one! Right-way (or Wrong-way) to proceed in a situation (!) This is also the point at which there may occur a passel of duelling fav Quotations from Large Books: as each contestant displays the larger-Righteousness: the One which You *should* adhere to. And this can be so confusing.
I think they mean conflict because many people have gray areas in their ethics and values, where I have very very few gray areas. I prefer the world to be in black and white, but at least I'm smart enough to know it can't always be. I'm used to classes that have exact questions with exact answers, as a rule, and I think that's what worries them. However, I took Gender Communication last semester, and it had NO clear answers, and yet I enjoyed the class, and especially the discussion aspect of it. The Ethics class is discussion intensive, and that sounds inviting.
(Did you ever catch the flic from the '50s The Loved One ??)
Sorry, never saw that one.
Nightowl >8#