Hold on a cotton-pickin' second

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #111,675 by pwhysall 7/28/03 2:47:50 AM Reply	Hold on a cotton-pickin' second How did the aforementioned kids install AD onto a workstation? Or do you mean that it was a workstation box with a copy of W2K Server on it? Cuz you sure as shit can't dcpromo a copy of W2K Pro :-) Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #111,709 by Andrew Grygus 7/28/03 11:14:11 AM Reply	Ezzakly . . . . a workstation with Win 2000 Server as it's OS. The kids "borrowed" it, of course - the cost might have been a red flag to the owners if the subject had come up. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]

5% of Windows installs crash twice or more times a day - (orion) - (35) - July 25, 2003, 08:42:18 PM EDT

Re: 5% of Windows installs crash twice or more times a day - (deSitter) - (2) - July 25, 2003, 09:41:04 PM EDT

Business idea - (orion) - July 25, 2003, 11:24:13 PM EDT

Many have tried, and many have died. - (Andrew Grygus) - July 26, 2003, 08:16:26 AM EDT

Re: 5% of Windows installs crash twice or more times a day - (andread) - (31) - July 26, 2003, 12:53:01 AM EDT

Report on restart? - (JayMehaffey) - July 26, 2003, 01:16:02 AM EDT

Re: 5% of Windows installs crash twice or more times a day - (Andrew Grygus) - (29) - July 26, 2003, 02:48:26 AM EDT

FUD - (pwhysall) - (28) - July 26, 2003, 03:28:16 AM EDT

Over 70% of the installed base is 98 or earlier . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (27) - July 26, 2003, 03:44:29 AM EDT

Not convinced. - (pwhysall) - (26) - July 26, 2003, 03:58:25 AM EDT

Have to agree with Peter - (Silverlock) - July 26, 2003, 08:26:54 AM EDT

Most of the world is small business and . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (24) - July 26, 2003, 11:29:59 AM EDT

Agreed - (jake123) - (23) - July 27, 2003, 09:21:12 AM EDT

Fools - (pwhysall) - (22) - July 27, 2003, 12:34:59 PM EDT

You can't underestimate - (jake123) - July 27, 2003, 01:09:44 PM EDT

We see remarkably little data loss . . - (Andrew Grygus) - July 27, 2003, 02:52:50 PM EDT

Keeping older hardware and software - (orion) - (19) - July 27, 2003, 04:22:39 PM EDT

Re: Keeping older hardware and software - (pwhysall) - (18) - July 27, 2003, 04:26:38 PM EDT

He he . . OK, here's one . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - July 27, 2003, 06:25:40 PM EDT

Haha - (pwhysall) - (2) - July 27, 2003, 06:32:41 PM EDT

Oh, it worked quite well enough . . - (Andrew Grygus) - July 27, 2003, 06:45:28 PM EDT

"AD works well"___Maybe for *you* it does. - (Ashton) - July 28, 2003, 06:52:02 AM EDT

Hold on a cotton-pickin' second - (pwhysall) - (1) - July 28, 2003, 02:47:50 AM EDT

Ezzakly . . - (Andrew Grygus) - July 28, 2003, 11:14:11 AM EDT

Differences between XP Home and XP Pro - (orion) - (11) - July 27, 2003, 06:43:42 PM EDT

Re: Differences between XP Home and XP Pro - (pwhysall) - (10) - July 28, 2003, 02:36:46 AM EDT

Okay, Peter, I'll bite. - (mmoffitt) - (7) - July 28, 2003, 11:47:05 AM EDT

VB6 apps crashing on XP - (andread) - (2) - July 28, 2003, 01:13:49 PM EDT

Do you have any cites for the incompatibilities? - (bbronson) - (1) - July 28, 2003, 02:16:26 PM EDT

Re: Do you have any cites for the incompatibilities? - (orion) - July 28, 2003, 03:40:04 PM EDT

Hey, Peter. - (mmoffitt) - July 29, 2003, 09:16:12 AM EDT

Re: Okay, Peter, I'll bite. - (pwhysall) - (2) - July 29, 2003, 03:38:45 PM EDT

OT: What's been your .Net experience? - (mmoffitt) - (1) - July 29, 2003, 05:15:56 PM EDT

Absolutely nuffink whatsoever :-) - (pwhysall) - July 29, 2003, 05:19:46 PM EDT

Don't take my word for it - (orion) - (1) - July 28, 2003, 03:49:34 PM EDT

I did, you plonker. -NT - (pwhysall) - July 29, 2003, 01:37:11 AM EDT

Full ahead flank!
207 ms