MLP: TheInq on what 64-bits is and isn't good for. - (Another Scott) - (17) - July 16, 2003, 09:51:08 AM EDT
         Nice! -NT - (deSitter) - July 16, 2003, 10:04:31 AM EDT
         Re: MLP: TheInq on what 64-bits is and isn't good for. - (qstephens) - (15) - July 18, 2003, 07:32:06 PM EDT
             Saw it. Good rebuttal. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - July 18, 2003, 11:52:08 PM EDT
             Linkz0r? -NT - (pwhysall) - (1) - July 19, 2003, 06:35:59 AM EDT
                 It got moved off the front page. - (Another Scott) - July 19, 2003, 08:58:46 AM EDT
             Not sure I agree on one point you make... - (a6l6e6x) - (11) - July 20, 2003, 09:30:11 PM EDT
                 Wrong reason - (JayMehaffey) - (6) - July 20, 2003, 10:36:44 PM EDT
                     And to get even messier . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - July 20, 2003, 11:28:51 PM EDT
                         Re: And to get even messier . . - (deSitter) - (1) - July 20, 2003, 11:38:32 PM EDT
                             Difference in scale and gas mix. - (Andrew Grygus) - July 21, 2003, 12:08:56 AM EDT
                         Ah: Mr. Edwin Land, ___I presume ;-) -NT - (Ashton) - July 20, 2003, 11:49:38 PM EDT
                         Cones? - (deSitter) - (1) - July 20, 2003, 11:50:06 PM EDT
                             Yeah, that's the critter. - (Andrew Grygus) - July 21, 2003, 12:08:26 AM EDT
                 About colour - (pwhysall) - July 21, 2003, 03:07:29 AM EDT
                 Gray range would improve - (SpiceWare) - (2) - July 21, 2003, 11:40:31 AM EDT
                     Not so, IIRC - (pwhysall) - (1) - July 21, 2003, 12:19:19 PM EDT
                         Haven't found much - (SpiceWare) - July 21, 2003, 11:27:14 PM EDT