IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New So civil contracts can be restrained by sex?
wuzzup wid that? Since prenups, civil suits, paternity suits and contract law can cover all of the above I think the state should relinquish any interest in tracking marriages. In the old days that was how paternity was determined, DNA testing takes care of that. No reason for state involved marriages at all.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

As the Poets have mournfully sung.
Death takes the innocent young,
The rolling in money,
the screamingly funny,
And those who are very well hung.
W.H. Auden
New That's not what I was saying
I was only pointing out that the church/state separation angle doesn't apply. Sex restrictions on a contract? I don't see how the state could justify it. Realistically though, the religious theme is an undercurrent of many laws. If you support separation of church and state, how do you justify Sunday bans on booze or other retail sales?
-----------------------------------------
[link|http://www.talion.com/questionw.html|?W]
Where were you in 72?
New I dont believe in restrictions
If Denny's can stay open 24X7 so should Al's Sports Bar. Thats why I love Reno Nevada, work all night and have a beer after work at 8:30am.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]

As the Poets have mournfully sung.
Death takes the innocent young,
The rolling in money,
the screamingly funny,
And those who are very well hung.
W.H. Auden
New A little craziness for you...
I think you'll find that the "state" doesn't want to sanction this, 'cause the insurance industry doesn't want to cover same sex partners (if they can get away with it - which they have for a long time) nor do they ("states") want to pay spousal medicaid, SS, etc. to people they have historically gotten a free ride with (anywhere between a 3% to 10% / 2 hit).

In any case, I bet it would cost the "state" lots of money, no?
Just a few thoughts,

Screamer


But take your time, think a lot,
Why, think of everything you've got.
For you will still be here tomorrow, but your dreams may not.


Y. Islam - Father and Son
     "Paranoia strikes deep..." - (jb4) - (15)
         Re: "Paranoia strikes deep..." - (SpiceWare) - (2)
             Good point...one that is often (if not always) lost when... - (jb4) - (1)
                 they published it - (SpiceWare)
         He got a couple slams in on us up here too - (jake123) - (10)
             same here - (SpiceWare)
             If marriage is a religious thingy - (boxley) - (6)
                 The current and new law - (jake123)
                 More than religious - (Silverlock) - (4)
                     So civil contracts can be restrained by sex? - (boxley) - (3)
                         That's not what I was saying - (Silverlock) - (1)
                             I dont believe in restrictions - (boxley)
                         A little craziness for you... - (screamer)
             Re: He got a couple slams in on us up here too - (Ashton)
             Hey, tweak away, buddy! - (jb4)
         One should mention.. - (deSitter)

No! Try not! Do or do not, there is no try.
59 ms