That won't cut it

Post #105,671 by Silverlock 6/11/03 9:05:52 AM Reply	That won't cut it Quoting a member of the administration accused/proven of having lied to refute charges that the administration lied isn't going to work here bubba. ----------------------------------------- [link\|http://www.talion.com/questionw.html\|?W] Where were you in 72?
Post #105,673 by johnu 6/11/03 9:15:16 AM Reply	Re: That won't cut it Quoting a member of the administration... Dick Gephardt is a member of the adminstration? ...accused/proven of having lied to refute charges that the administration lied isn't going to work here bubba. Which member would that be? What did he lie about and what is the proof that he lied? Regards, John
Post #105,688 by Silverlock 6/11/03 10:49:54 AM Reply	Following your link WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said Sunday it was "nonsense" to label U.S. intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction as bogus. How do you read the name Colin Powell as Dick Gephardt? The little miss innocent act won't cut it either. If you want to remain willfully ignorant, that's your choice. I certainly wouldn't want to intrude in your bliss. ----------------------------------------- [link\|http://www.talion.com/questionw.html\|?W] Where were you in 72?
Post #105,700 by johnu 6/11/03 11:35:38 AM Reply	Re: Following your link How do you read the name Colin Powell as Dick Gephardt? Under the section "Powell's 'killer argument'" near the bottom: A key Democrat, however -- House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt of Missouri -- told CBS there would be an investigation, although he downplayed the significance. "We'll have an investigation in the Congress," said Gephardt, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination. "We should. You should, after any war, review what happened, what the intelligence was and whether things were done right." "But," he said, "there is long, consistent, clear evidence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. And I'm still convinced that we are going to find them." The little miss innocent act won't cut it either. If you want to remain willfully ignorant, that's your choice. I certainly wouldn't want to intrude in your bliss. Ok...I guess that would be a no to providing the proof... Rgards, John

Welcome to IWETHEY!