SCO's other shoe drops: SCO source code found in Linux - (admin) - (16) - May 2, 2003, 10:43:18 AM EDT
         Simple solution - (drewk) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 10:50:44 AM EDT
             Wouldn't it be funny... - (folkert) - May 2, 2003, 11:28:42 AM EDT
             Linux revision control - (kmself) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 11:40:24 AM EDT
                 Wouldn't that *have* to be the case? - (drewk) - May 2, 2003, 11:57:09 AM EDT
         SCO stabs their own lawyers in the back - (drewk) - (4) - May 2, 2003, 12:56:15 PM EDT
             ROFL - (admin) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 03:14:07 PM EDT
                 Hey! You're maligning snakes everywhere with that one -NT - (jake123) - (2) - May 2, 2003, 03:15:06 PM EDT
                     Sorry. -NT - (admin) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 03:15:38 PM EDT
                         :) -NT - (jake123) - May 2, 2003, 03:18:02 PM EDT
         So 10 lines of code == 20 years of [...] IP? - (jb4) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 01:25:40 PM EDT
             Hmmm - I wonder 'which' code they refer to ... IBM - (dmarker) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 06:27:19 PM EDT
                 Reminds me of Ashton Tate vs. Fox - (tablizer) - May 3, 2003, 01:41:35 AM EDT
             Depends on level of difference - (tuberculosis) - Aug. 21, 2007, 06:35:33 AM EDT
         Eric Raymond deconstructs SCO's argument. - (Another Scott) - (2) - May 5, 2003, 02:09:59 PM EDT
             Excellent resource. Thanks Scott -NT - (screamer) - May 6, 2003, 02:04:21 PM EDT
             The GPL argument is particularly compelling IMO - (kmself) - May 7, 2003, 01:54:17 AM EDT