(new) Unix

New UNIX newsgroups - (deSitter) - Sept. 17, 2004, 03:29:11 PM EDT

gcc on HPUX - (deSitter) - Sept. 17, 2004, 10:53:05 AM EDT

Can I run "private" copy of gcc? - (deSitter) - (1) - Sept. 17, 2004, 10:31:31 AM EDT

Course you can - (pwhysall) - Sept. 17, 2004, 10:32:16 AM EDT

Need ksh clues - (pwhysall) - (5) - Sept. 16, 2004, 10:31:02 AM EDT

www.kornshell.com - (deSitter) - (2) - Sept. 16, 2004, 10:36:49 AM EDT

Ta, will investigate. -NT - (pwhysall) - Sept. 16, 2004, 10:44:30 AM EDT

OK, so this sucks. - (pwhysall) - Sept. 16, 2004, 11:09:59 AM EDT

Runaway!!!!!!! - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 16, 2004, 08:08:36 PM EDT

He already knows the story... - (folkert) - Sept. 16, 2004, 11:37:59 PM EDT

SCO vs Linux. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 19, 2004, 02:29:59 AM EDT

SCO "City to City Tour" (%s/City to City/Farewell/g) ROFL -NT - (folkert) - Aug. 19, 2004, 01:21:22 PM EDT

HPUX 11 disk utilization question - (boxley) - (1) - July 28, 2004, 09:45:34 AM EDT

Disk space or Swap space? - (folkert) - July 28, 2004, 12:29:22 PM EDT

clustering, best practices and standards - (boxley) - (23) - June 21, 2004, 07:39:41 AM EDT

Single lock manager? - (broomberg) - (21) - June 21, 2004, 07:15:56 PM EDT

Saw something for this a while ago - (drewk) - (7) - June 21, 2004, 08:53:12 PM EDT

OT: Isn't PERL a no-no? -NT - (Another Scott) - (6) - June 21, 2004, 09:00:59 PM EDT

By who's measure? - (folkert) - (5) - June 21, 2004, 09:23:47 PM EDT

Too obscure, I guess. - (Another Scott) - (4) - June 21, 2004, 10:15:15 PM EDT

Bah, figured it was a captalization slam - (drewk) - (2) - June 21, 2004, 10:18:50 PM EDT

Thank you. I'll be here all week. -NT - (Another Scott) - June 21, 2004, 10:20:15 PM EDT

Fair, but note - (ben_tilly) - June 23, 2004, 10:39:24 AM EDT

I was already admonished for that. - (folkert) - June 21, 2004, 10:27:27 PM EDT

all nodes should separate - (boxley) - (12) - June 22, 2004, 06:59:33 AM EDT

Nice theory - (broomberg) - (11) - June 22, 2004, 09:41:39 AM EDT

it should do the following - (boxley) - (10) - June 22, 2004, 11:03:01 AM EDT

Are all nodes full peers? - (drewk) - (9) - June 22, 2004, 11:34:35 AM EDT

different setup - (boxley) - (7) - June 22, 2004, 11:40:34 AM EDT

You've described exactly what... - (folkert) - (6) - June 22, 2004, 11:59:00 AM EDT

Alternatively... - (pwhysall) - (5) - June 22, 2004, 01:06:36 PM EDT

I could, if I could get a real multithreaded OS - (boxley) - (4) - June 22, 2004, 01:38:46 PM EDT

You want VMS. You just don't know it yet. -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - June 22, 2004, 03:29:35 PM EDT

40k a month, no thanx, took one out of there 2 years ago -NT - (boxley) - (2) - June 22, 2004, 06:01:14 PM EDT

40k a month? WTF for? - (pwhysall) - (1) - June 22, 2004, 06:06:42 PM EDT

lease with the supplier(big ass telco), no support at all - (boxley) - June 22, 2004, 06:17:47 PM EDT

"My god, it's full of peers!" -NT - (deSitter) - June 22, 2004, 12:47:09 PM EDT

http://linux-ha.org/ -NT - (drewk) - June 22, 2004, 01:57:50 AM EDT

Good introduction to what "load averages" mean - (ben_tilly) - (6) - May 13, 2004, 11:26:26 AM EDT

useful, thanks! -NT - (Steve Lowe) - May 13, 2004, 11:44:51 AM EDT

Basically this: - (folkert) - (2) - May 13, 2004, 12:29:18 PM EDT

This I know - (ben_tilly) - (1) - May 13, 2004, 02:11:48 PM EDT

This particular set of machines were PowerRISC and AIX - (folkert) - May 13, 2004, 06:18:59 PM EDT

ICLRPD (new thread) - (Yendor) - May 13, 2004, 02:12:45 PM EDT

I recently saw a load average of 600 - (broomberg) - May 22, 2004, 06:35:35 PM EDT

GPL and Sun. - (folkert) - (2) - May 1, 2004, 05:51:41 PM EDT

They have lawyers, that's how ... duh -NT - (drewk) - May 1, 2004, 06:06:37 PM EDT

cocoa on solaris would be cool - (boxley) - May 1, 2004, 07:44:02 PM EDT

Question for heads - (deSitter) - (23) - Feb. 11, 2004, 07:23:31 PM EST

Probably because the dash IS an option on its own, to tar? -NT - (CRConrad) - (16) - Feb. 11, 2004, 07:32:41 PM EST

Nice try, but - (deSitter) - (15) - Feb. 11, 2004, 07:45:55 PM EST

No, for many (most?) old commands, that's DOUBLE dash. (*) - (CRConrad) - (14) - Feb. 11, 2004, 07:57:44 PM EST

Re: No, for many (most?) old commands, that's DOUBLE dash. ( - (deSitter) - (13) - Feb. 11, 2004, 08:04:28 PM EST

WTF is "bash"?!? - (CRConrad) - (12) - Feb. 11, 2004, 08:37:13 PM EST

Bzzt, wrong. - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2004, 08:49:13 PM EST

Go buy a sense of humour, nitwit. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2004, 02:43:29 AM EST

I recognize *funny* jokes perfectly well - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 12, 2004, 01:27:00 PM EST

Re: WTF is "bash"?!? - (deSitter) - (8) - Feb. 11, 2004, 08:53:19 PM EST

blow me read the quoted man pages I cited!!! - (boxley) - (5) - Feb. 11, 2004, 10:13:04 PM EST

Re: blow me read the quoted man pages I cited!!! - (deSitter) - (4) - Feb. 11, 2004, 10:32:08 PM EST

also notice the description of the flags - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 11, 2004, 10:38:08 PM EST

Re: also notice the description of the flags - (deSitter) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2004, 11:38:03 PM EST

/me/bangs head on floor - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 11, 2004, 11:43:13 PM EST

s'one send email to ESR or Moen -NT - (deSitter) - Feb. 11, 2004, 11:57:06 PM EST

Then shut the f...heck up and listen, f...numbskull! - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2004, 03:07:08 AM EST

jEEEz -NT - (deSitter) - Feb. 12, 2004, 03:26:27 AM EST

Unix Programmers Manual Volume 1 Bell Labs - (boxley) - (5) - Feb. 11, 2004, 07:55:42 PM EST

Re: Unix Programmers Manual Volume 1 Bell Labs - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Feb. 11, 2004, 08:27:20 PM EST

My edition is 1979 and doesnt state that? what edition are - (boxley) - Feb. 11, 2004, 10:10:26 PM EST

Re: Unix Programmers Manual Volume 1 Bell Labs - (deSitter) - (2) - Feb. 11, 2004, 10:35:17 PM EST

No it doesn't. - (pwhysall) - Feb. 12, 2004, 03:13:29 AM EST

Dash by itself is meaningless in tar - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 12, 2004, 01:18:59 PM EST

Welcome to IWETHEY!