Conyers: Ashcroft should have recused himself from MS case
- (admin)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 04:33:18 PM EST
Dissenting states ask to see windows source
- (Silverlock)
- (7)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 01:03:39 PM EST
Might backfire
- (tjsinclair)
- (5)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 01:53:14 PM EST
I'll do it!
- (jb4)
- (2)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 01:57:42 PM EST
Well you will get volunteers for one thing at least...
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 02:37:11 PM EST
*chortle*
-NT
- (jb4)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 08:57:08 AM EST
Lots of eyeballs make any problem shallow.
- (marlowe)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 02:26:05 PM EST
No risk.
- (Andrew Grygus)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 11:38:23 PM EST
Didn't they already show the code wasn't inextricable?
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 02:35:06 PM EST
Cornering the market on politicians and lawyers
- (marlowe)
- (5)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 10:06:22 AM EST
Will Microsoft fall back on their Judge Jackson strategy?
- (ben_tilly)
- (4)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 12:59:39 PM EST
Dangerous trend.
- (static)
- (3)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 09:33:30 PM EST
Was it Heinlein (via Lazarus Long) who said
- (tjsinclair)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 11:50:02 PM EST
Contempt charges?
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 04:15:50 AM EST
Contempt.
- (static)
- Feb. 16, 2002, 04:50:49 AM EST
"Accounting irregularities" at MS
- (Silverlock)
- (2)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 09:19:32 AM EST
This was mentioned in InfoWorld back in ~1998, IIRC...
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 10:02:07 AM EST
Plus, there's the fact they're sitting on $36B in cash and
- (tonytib)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 10:10:15 AM EST
Last minute witnesses
- (marlowe)
- (3)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 10:29:33 AM EST
While I don't like MS on general principle
- (SpiceWare)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 11:45:40 AM EST
Hide the ball? More like...
- (jb4)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 12:22:31 PM EST
It's a dirty trick but legal
- (Steven A S)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 10:18:27 PM EST
Who thinks that the DoJ will respond to many comments?
- (ben_tilly)
- (11)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 01:24:10 PM EST
I'm more concerned with what CKK will do
-NT
- (tonytib)
- (10)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 07:30:09 PM EST
Ultimately so am I
- (ben_tilly)
- (9)
- Feb. 11, 2002, 07:59:31 PM EST
What accountability would that be?
- (Ashton)
- (6)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 03:53:34 AM EST
You are right, only a blue sky chance at it really happening
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 07:18:30 AM EST
You want your country back?
- (mhuber)
- (4)
- Feb. 13, 2002, 12:21:01 AM EST
I could consort with honest debauchery.
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 04:44:08 PM EST
Language murder?
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 15, 2002, 04:21:01 AM EST
Hey, you're impinging on my campaign!
- (inthane-chan)
- (1)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 10:21:51 PM EST
Well...
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 14, 2002, 11:52:26 PM EST
Another possible explanation.
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 08:18:35 AM EST
What? (DoJ)
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 12, 2002, 02:07:45 PM EST
Microsoft & DoJ demand, "no critics!".
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- Feb. 8, 2002, 12:25:37 PM EST
Maybe a lawyer can clear this up for me
- (drewk)
- Feb. 8, 2002, 12:54:14 PM EST
What exactly is their problem?
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 8, 2002, 11:34:46 PM EST
Microsoft survey
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (8)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 04:32:34 PM EST
Re: Microsoft survey
- (Steve Lowe)
- (2)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 04:37:26 PM EST
Make perception so, then it'll have to behave so?
- (CRConrad)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 05:34:37 PM EST
Sounds like
- (imric)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 07:30:29 PM EST
Why didn't you blow them off?
- (static)
- (4)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 08:01:17 PM EST
No, no, no!
- (Silverlock)
- Feb. 8, 2002, 12:17:31 AM EST
Why do that?
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- Feb. 8, 2002, 01:12:37 AM EST
Where do you GET those groups?
- (wharris2)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 08:05:40 PM EST
Ah. Different sort of survey.
- (static)
- Feb. 9, 2002, 11:40:28 PM EST
Public comments: the votes have been tallied
- (marlowe)
- (2)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 11:58:50 AM EST
Hmmmm...
- (jb4)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 01:32:10 PM EST
More details from AP
- (marlowe)
- Feb. 7, 2002, 04:46:50 PM EST