Heh.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #99,908 by admin 5/2/03 12:51:14 PM Reply	Heh. I just emailed Cringely about the issue... which is why your response is first. ;-) Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #99,923 by jb4 5/2/03 1:40:27 PM Reply	Heh indeed! Thank you both Cringe is OK, but every once in a while he does screw the pooch. jb4 "We continue to live in a world where all our know-how is locked into binary files in an unknown format. If our documents are our corporate memory, Microsoft still has us all condemned to Alzheimer's." Simon Phipps, SUN Microsystems

Re-rewriting .Net code? - (johnu) - (11) - May 2, 2003, 11:16:11 AM EDT

Wouldn't be the first time. And Cringely on rewriting. - (Another Scott) - (8) - May 2, 2003, 12:31:22 PM EDT

I couldn't disagree more - (drewk) - (3) - May 2, 2003, 12:46:58 PM EDT

Heh. - (admin) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 12:51:14 PM EDT

Heh indeed! Thank you both - (jb4) - May 2, 2003, 01:40:27 PM EDT

I've had to - (jbrabeck) - May 2, 2003, 04:38:51 PM EDT

And he's wrong about that. - (admin) - (1) - May 2, 2003, 12:50:22 PM EDT

I quite agree. - (static) - May 2, 2003, 10:58:14 PM EDT

So what does *this* mean? - (tjsinclair) - May 2, 2003, 07:10:45 PM EDT

Just received an answer from Bob. - (admin) - May 5, 2003, 09:45:21 AM EDT

Re: Re-rewriting .Net code? - (johnu) - (1) - May 6, 2003, 08:06:22 AM EDT

It could be a lower level thing - (altmann) - May 6, 2003, 06:05:37 PM EDT

Its superficial lower whole number is belongs to us!
48 ms