IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New How about Windows 3.0?
As I recall, Windows 3.0 had an 8086/8088 mode. In the college lab I used to work in, we had 640K IBM PC systems with CGA running Windows 3.0 over a Novell Netware network. Windows 3.0 was loaded off a network drive, the PC and XT systems did not have a hard drive but a floppy boot disk to get on the Netware network. We also had bus mice on the PC and XT systems. It was I think 640x200 mode with 2 colors with the CGA driver.

Of course when DOS came out, 640K was not very common. So Windows 3.0, GEOS/GeoWorks, etc wouldn't have been possible without extra memory added.


"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]
New How about a warm Ex-Lax milkshake with a mouse port?
     Microsoft fragments Windows - (orion) - (14)
         As with e. coli - there are many many different strains. -NT - (Ashton) - (4)
             There is another similarity - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 Bwahahaha! Did you make that up? :D -NT - (tseliot) - (1)
                     Yes - glad you liked it :-) -NT - (ben_tilly)
                 Wag-Ed *hates* people like you! -NT - (Ashton)
         So, umm..er....gee... Did BillG(e) LIE during the trial? - (jb4) - (1)
             Same way as the rest of the country. - (inthane-chan)
         Re: Microsoft fragments Windows - (linuxuser) - (6)
             Misinterpretation - (deSitter) - (5)
                 Ever see Geoworks? - (inthane-chan) - (4)
                     Or, as one comentator said at the time . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Geoworks was great... - (imric)
                     How about Windows 3.0? - (orion) - (1)
                         How about a warm Ex-Lax milkshake with a mouse port? -NT - (Ashton)

Of course I may like it partly because I agree with it...
76 ms