IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Most NT are 2-Gig because . . .
. . although NT would install on a 4-Gig partition, it would only create a 2-Gig. If you wanted 4-Gigs, you had to prep the disk in advance, and most NT installers didn't know that.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New ++Double.Good.
After an Install to 4GB, you could go upto ~32GB with a Partition Mangler.

I had to do that recently with NT as a reporting product I installed was not supported on anything newer than NT4-SP6a. And the product has "debug" loggin turned on... *WITH* SQL tracing...

needless to say... so pretty dern big files get created... and deleted.
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]   [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!]
[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Writing on wall, Microsoft to develop apps for Linux by 2004]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints.
New Re: Most NT are 2-Gig because . . .
Not true. If you opt for NTFS, the maximum partition size is 4G.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Back when these systems were done . .
. . everyone was being advised to use FAT for the boot partition so it could be accessed should NT fail to boot. There were no easily available NTFS tools back then. This may not have been very valid advice, but it was commonly followed. I encounter a lot of 2-Gig NT machines that are crashing due to being out of disk space. I have to do another one next week.

Fortunately, the guy who was in charge of IS at that client disappeared without notice and without trace, because I off-loaded the partition I'm going to shrink to a Linux powered NAS (Network Attached Storage) box - he'd have had a heart attack knowing there was a non-Microsoft OS in house.

Users report a stunning increase in performance over the old Compaq Prosignia server.

Incidentally, several prominant NAS companies shifted to Windows when Microsoft came out with an appliance license. At least one has gone out of business (I read their throughput was dismal after the conversion), but others, including Dell, still sell such devices.

The Linux NAS boxes serve Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac and other clients, but the Windows ones are incompatible with Linux, Unix and Mac filenames. This is never mentioned in the literature. I heard about this from a guy who bought a Dell NAS to store Oracle data on and found it useless for that purpose.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     Convert FAT32 to NTFS - (bluke) - (8)
         Re: Convert FAT32 to NTFS - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Will do it tonight - (bluke)
         Have done it on a bunch of older NT machines . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
             Re: Have done it on a bunch of older NT machines . . - (andread) - (4)
                 Most NT are 2-Gig because . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                     ++Double.Good. - (folkert)
                     Re: Most NT are 2-Gig because . . . - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Back when these systems were done . . - (Andrew Grygus)

It's like reading nadsat, only without the clarity.
50 ms