didn't you postulate that Clinton was responsible

1,095 registered users | 2 active users | 2 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #81,143 by boxley 2/12/03 11:26:49 AM Reply	didn't you postulate that Clinton was responsible for the economic boom of the nineties? If it was not you, I apologise. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #81,146 by Silverlock 2/12/03 11:47:18 AM Reply	Even if I think you reverse cause and effect. My position is that Clinton was a good president, period. Not because he helped the economy. That was a result of his being a good president. You said (paraphrase) Reagan was good because he stopped the cold war. I say to that, a bad man may have a good quality. Hell he may have had several good qualities, he was probably nice to puppies. Doesn't change the fact that Reagan's administration was the 2nd most visibly corrupt in modern history. And it doesn't change the fact that Reagan was NOT a good president. How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches
Post #81,164 by boxley 2/12/03 12:13:55 PM Reply	who was second, johnson or nixon? will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #81,169 by Silverlock 2/12/03 12:17:45 PM Reply	As I stated Reagan: 2nd.... First? You expect anyone to believe you don't know? How many lives per gallon? --Sign outside of various churches

Entertainers against the war - (Silverlock) - (16) - Feb. 12, 2003, 09:50:37 AM EST

very entertaining - (boxley) - (15) - Feb. 12, 2003, 10:02:53 AM EST

One word - (Silverlock) - (14) - Feb. 12, 2003, 10:08:48 AM EST

Yes he was very entertaining -NT - (boxley) - (13) - Feb. 12, 2003, 10:23:15 AM EST

But not a very good president. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (12) - Feb. 12, 2003, 10:51:58 AM EST

Ending the cold war makes him not a good president? - (boxley) - (11) - Feb. 12, 2003, 10:53:50 AM EST

Re: Ending the cold war makes him not a good president? - (inthane-chan) - (3) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:02:00 AM EST

Re: The "Blame Clinton" thing... - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:03:37 AM EST

But Raygun does deserve credit. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2003, 12:23:54 PM EST

Straw that broke the camel's back. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 12, 2003, 12:27:10 PM EST

Loving your mother makes you a bad man? - (Silverlock) - (6) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:02:13 AM EST

it was YOUR measure in particular I was using -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:04:16 AM EST

What? - (Silverlock) - (4) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:15:25 AM EST

didn't you postulate that Clinton was responsible - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:26:49 AM EST

Even if - (Silverlock) - (2) - Feb. 12, 2003, 11:47:18 AM EST

who was second, johnson or nixon? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2003, 12:13:55 PM EST

As I stated - (Silverlock) - Feb. 12, 2003, 12:17:45 PM EST

iwethey.org

That is not actually a charming anecdote!
41 ms