OT: gcc 2.95 native STL is very bad

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #80,983 by Arkadiy 2/11/03 5:45:33 PM 2/11/03 5:45:54 PM Reply	OT: gcc 2.95 native STL is very bad Remind me again, why you don't want to switch to 3.2? -- We have only 2 things to worry about: That things will never get back to normal, and that they already have. Edited by Arkadiy Feb. 11, 2003, 05:45:54 PM EST Expand All History
Post #81,012 by admin 2/11/03 8:19:14 PM Reply	I'm not using native 2.95 STL. We're using STLport. 3.2 has it's own issues... code portability for one (I don't have much time to finish this port) and several bugs that I came across. The Intel port is going quite well, so hopefully that will be the last compiler I have to attempt. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

More C++ BS: - (admin) - (21) - Feb. 10, 2003, 11:39:30 AM EST

OK, the problem here is the implementation, not the language - (jb4) - (10) - Feb. 10, 2003, 04:57:58 PM EST

Oh, come the heck on! Yes, it IS the language! - (CRConrad) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:08:53 PM EST

C'mon Christian... - (jb4) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:35:53 PM EST

Not that big a stretch... - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:37:42 PM EST

So, it's a great language, if your definition... - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:42:23 PM EST

NO, that's NOT what I said. - (jb4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:58:08 PM EST

Yeah, its the language - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:05:26 PM EST

Re: Yeah, its the language - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:33:34 PM EST

Yes. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:19:07 PM EST

Advocacy aside: - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:35:08 PM EST

My understanding is: - (jb4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 05:50:57 PM EST

Update: test code: try the fun on YOUR c++ compiler! - (admin) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:13:45 PM EST

Borland C++ Builder 6 Pro compiles w/o error - (jb4) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:41:17 PM EST

Nifty for Windows users, eh? -NT - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:42:07 PM EST

In Linux-land, try Kylix... - (jb4) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:57:42 PM EST

I'll take a look then. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2003, 07:15:22 PM EST

GCC on Jaguar (3.1) works okay -NT - (tjsinclair) - Feb. 10, 2003, 08:09:40 PM EST

Update: what I did to workaround this - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:52:39 PM EST

LUCK!!! ;-) -NT - (jb4) - Feb. 10, 2003, 06:58:30 PM EST

OT: gcc 2.95 native STL is very bad - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 11, 2003, 05:45:54 PM EST

I'm not using native 2.95 STL. - (admin) - Feb. 11, 2003, 08:19:14 PM EST

Sit down there, you. Your shuns have no effect on me anymore.
223 ms