"The article also talks about the odd situation with British intelligence agencies. They are actually pro-war, but object to the way the government is misleading the public to promote the war. This is why there have been a steady stream of leaks from said agencies that point out the flaws in the government case."
I understand this point. My case is that Bush admin are lying to us and I resent that. If they made a case that argued for our longterm survival, I would buy it a lot better than the bare faced deceptions or lies. But the reality is they can't state their real objectives because they are so selfish in terms of dominating the world's resurces & energy. So in one sense it becomes a catch-22 ...
1) We (US) want to dominate rather than risk being dominated (based on belief that someone will)
2) We can't admit that publicly to the world despite it being obvious to some
3) We need the support of our people & need to win over as many others as we can
4) We (US) have to do some bad deeds to achieve the dominance we require
5) We have to convince our people that what we are doing is really good else we will have another Vietnam political disaster on our hands as well as possibly failing to secure our dominance
6) World trade will help level the playing field in time, but without a dominant superpower to provide the umbrella of peace (our peace) we can't achieve free world trade (imagine a terrorist group being able tp blow up the main global undersea internet cables at a time world trade becomes dependant on them)
We live in challenging times
Doug Marker