for those who still "trust" Bush

Post #72,713 by boxley 1/5/03 3:40:34 PM Reply	for those who still "trust" Bush here is a statement by his brother Jeb introducing his new Florida SC Justice the court should not guard individual rights "at the expense of our collective right to self government" State mitt uns I suppose. Commie bastard and can his brother be so different? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #72,743 by Brandioch 1/5/03 6:15:31 PM Reply	Translator? and reference? I don't see how individual rights would conflict with our right to self government.
Post #72,745 by boxley 1/5/03 6:17:27 PM Reply	St Petes times, tree edition in Editorial in the big brother scheme all rights are collective not individual heil marx! thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
Post #73,162 by deSitter 1/7/03 11:11:00 AM Reply	My thesis ..has always been that the Repos are radical collectivists. This is why they are so hateful. -drl
Post #72,850 by a6l6e6x 1/6/03 12:04:33 AM Reply	Google is your friend, eventually. Announcing Bell's appointment, the governor said that the courts should not guard individual rights "at the expense of our collective right to self-government." Does Florida's governor actually believe that individual rights and self-government are inconsistent? Does Florida's new junior justice agree? If so, they think too little and care even less about the state and federal constitutions that both of them are sworn -- and will soon be sworn again -- to support, protect and defend. [link\|http://www.sptimes.com/2003/01/05/Perspective/Clouded_justice.shtml\|Link.] Alex "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session."\t-- Mark Twain
Post #73,585 by mhuber 1/9/03 2:53:30 AM Reply	individual rights VS self government The right to self government means the right of the State to do whatever the hell it wants. Or, in the less radical version, whatever it deems neccessary to protect itself. Which, in the current environment, is exactly the same in practice. The rights of the individual VS the rights of the collective is a fundimental tension throughout the history of non-dictatorial govornment. To declare an absolute position one way or the other is absurd. The one is anarchy and the other tyrany. ---- Whatever
Post #73,160 by marlowe 1/7/03 10:59:11 AM Reply	Yeah, Jeb's got some explaining to do. Perhaps he should rephrase. Or something. And damn quick. I don't trust Bush. I simply distrust him less than the vast majority of his opponents. Where's Abdul Rahman Yasin? The reason I don't budge is I'm waiting for you to catch up. "What must it feel like to lose an election to a retarded monkey?" - Andrew Sullivan "The US party calls in mortar fire on the enemy positions. The UN party stands up, climbs over the lip of the trench, and recites Robert\ufffds Rules of Order as it approaches the machine-gun positions." - Lileks [link\|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html\|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html] With luck: [link\|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@jbf~W~x49RjZfyJwplqwurpNmg0PAgM/marlowe//\|http://pascal.rockfo...mg0PAgM/marlowe//]

Welcome to IWETHEY!