"All in all, an interesting mix of fact, interpretation presented as fact, denial and pure ideological bullshit. I like the idea of using graphs. It makes the bullshit so much clearer."
The above is an accurate statement. I found the same mix in that particular link and his remarks on diminuizing people by name playing also a good point.

Marlowe when hearing nazi's thinks of concentration camps and jackboots not economic theory. He see's the word socialist and associates with the left. That is why I took the time to educate him with the further posts.
thanx,
bill

"Was not the decade of the 60s and the early part of the 70s considered to be radical era, a time when tradional values were questioned and rejected. In this case, the rise of fascism in America was a reaction to the "hippy era" and all that it implies. But this is not a wonder, the elites of the business world embrace stability and loathe changes. Stability translates into predictable profits, changes on the other hand are not predictable and could threaten profits. Now we have established the link between the moneyed elite and the reactionary nature of fascism."
the above was my quote of the link.
"In this case, the rise of fascism in America was a reaction to the "hippy era" and all that it implies"
The rise of facism and all it implies was not a result of the hippy era. The rise was in direct result of the supreme court rulings that gave us the miranda warnings, riots over black vs rights issus and the civil rights movements. Big business used civil disorder to expain US flight when a horrendous trade issue began to arise. A shoe completed by vietnamese labor for $2.00 could compete with$32 dollar BK nights with a large markup. This is not facism but taxable trade imbalance. If goods were landed at American Shores and the profit margin was taxed at the landing price vs the selling price we would not be in the situation we are today. This is not facism it is imblance of trade.
thanx,
bill

thanx,