IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Depends on the particular "dissent"
Post #43,990
by marlowe
6/30/02 9:39:01 AM
Reply
New Depends on the particular "dissent"
For example, to condemn shrilly any attempt by our civilization to protect itself against aggression, without even trying to offer meaningful alternatives, well that's not exactly loyal opposition, is it?

Anti-American is as anti-American does.
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfir...e/index.html]
Truth is that which is the case. Accept no substitutes.
If competence is considered "hubris" then may I and my country always be as "arrogant" as we can possibly manage.
Post #43,992
by Brandioch
6/30/02 11:59:44 AM
Reply
New Gotta love those adj.'s and adv.'s
condemn shrilly
Note: not just "condemn".

offer meaningful alternatives
Note: "meaningful".

And guess who is the judge of whether something is "shrill" or "meaningful" or not.

:)

Because YOU do not agree with something does NOT mean it is unConstitutional.
     "Dissent is not unAmerican" - (Ashton) - (4) - June 29, 2002, 03:03:21 AM EDT
         I'd prefer "Dissent is not unConstitutional". - (Brandioch) - (1) - June 29, 2002, 06:02:35 PM EDT
             Problem with that - - (Ashton) - June 29, 2002, 07:05:19 PM EDT
         Depends on the particular "dissent" - (marlowe) - (1) - June 30, 2002, 09:39:01 AM EDT
             Gotta love those adj.'s and adv.'s - (Brandioch) - June 30, 2002, 11:59:44 AM EDT

Those bastards!
79 ms