the 'credit' is all his. And I wouldn't expect Red to be expert in separating his religion from civics either; surely he has lots of company in missing that distinction - specially as entertainer.
Was he preciously 'prescient' - or isn't it almost the same stretch to suppose that.. somewhere inside, even then - he sorta grokked "what this might Really be about" ? And saw that that bucolic era was a bit early for most to notice or, say: risk being Seen to notice?
But c'mon Mr. Innocent Neutral Jokester: your punchline pretty well begs for the rebuttal to the original implicit presumption: ~ that,
you'd have to be some kinda future- Commie-Pinko to find anything Wrong with mixing [My God] and another's [Patriotism] -- with blender set to puree.
As I implied - Wagg-Edd would ever lack sufficient subtlety (undoubtedly emulating their virtual-owner to a T).. to present this material as if it were merely a humorous 'prediction' that oddly.. came to be. As you protest was your er aim.
So this would make you an: upgrade to their Team! (were you to accept the ignominy, that is ;-) Prolly you wouldn't though; I doubt you could bring it off and I'll bet you do too. You ain't That far gone ;-)
Ashton deWitt Robespierre