IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Maslow and obesity
The lower levels of Maslow’s pyramid reflect material well-being. But material abundance is not itself the cause of anomie and angst. Rather, ancestral, evolved solutions to lower-level problems also tended to contain solutions to higher-level problems as well. As these ancestral solutions are made obsolete by solutions that are more efficient on the material level, the more ineffable, higher-level problems they solved present themselves anew. Simple abundance of food is not the cause of obesity, but rather the loss of carefully evolved ancestral diets. Our ancestors found it easy to get to sleep because they were tired from intense physical activity; we often find it a challenge to get to sleep because modern solutions to material problems do not include physical activity. We are lonely and bored not because of material abundance simpliciter, but because the specific cultural patterns that have reproduced themselves to produce material abundance have whittled away the social and psychological solutions that were built into old solutions to material problems.

http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2016/11/03/a-bad-carver/
--

Drew
New Had to look up "anomie" and "simpliciter" just to understand it.
Pretentious.
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
New Ha!
I think they're perfectly cromulent words.
New Had to look up that one too! :)
I don't do Simpsons.
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
New Wrestling with the ineffable always beats the shit outta Boolean er, 'logical positivism' dunnit?
Kinda liked (on just a quick scan; will read more of the always outré ribbonfarm ..anon)
Each time we become aware of bad fit in the world – traffic, getting sore from sitting in a chair too long, a moment of loneliness, a software malfunction – we are tempted to nod along with the Unabomber that industrialization was a mistake.

So we can understand, a little bit, why technological change triggers a sacredness immune response. Technology threatens the fragile order with which humans orient themselves. Technology threatens to tear the fabric of society, and even to carve up humans themselves into separate functions. Previous structures of meaning may not survive.

Technological de-condensation is a kind of logical analysis, and logical analysis is very impolite in sacred matters. Technology breaks down unified structures and demonstrates that they are partible. Christopher Alexander describes a “loss of innocence” when using logical, instead of intuitive (sacredness-respecting), means for design: {. . .]
aka (por moi) Super-string Theory can't hold a candle to any genuine metaphysical insights and, Thank Cthulhu: there ain't-Never gonna be {some Algorithm App [?] for $1000-a-pop?}
which will just do *That* sorta Work for the mentally/emotionally lazy.) I wot.

Thanks. Keeps the little grey cells tuned up, ignition advance and injector-timing: ✓
(Following a 1.5 hour YouTube iPhone 6S+ How-To ..is decidedly orthogonal to any actually meaningful endeavour of intellect)
it's more like "the moving brain's" forte; whatcha Get: is merely 'muscle memory', at best. Not Content, Right?
     Maslow and obesity - (drook) - (4)
         Had to look up "anomie" and "simpliciter" just to understand it. - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
             Ha! - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 Had to look up that one too! :) - (a6l6e6x)
         Wrestling with the ineffable always beats the shit outta Boolean er, 'logical positivism' dunnit? - (Ashton)

It goes well with the chicken.
57 ms