Yup, just like I said . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (45) - May 23, 2002, 09:45:48 AM EDT
         I disagree with your take on RedHat - (drewk) - (43) - May 23, 2002, 12:21:32 PM EDT
             You can get someone else to support . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (42) - May 23, 2002, 12:49:37 PM EDT
                 Now I see what you're getting at - (drewk) - (32) - May 23, 2002, 01:11:08 PM EDT
                     Depends on your definition of broad, and . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (31) - May 23, 2002, 03:21:08 PM EDT
                         point 4 - (boxley) - May 23, 2002, 03:28:31 PM EDT
                         Re; built-in flexibilty - (tjsinclair) - (29) - May 23, 2002, 04:01:19 PM EDT
                             Maybe you should... - (jb4) - (28) - May 24, 2002, 02:23:04 PM EDT
                                 Programming at the coalface with that attitude. - (static) - (27) - May 24, 2002, 10:43:21 PM EDT
                                     Variable variables are bad - (ben_tilly) - (25) - May 25, 2002, 12:08:43 AM EDT
                                         They are open to incredible abuse, yes. - (static) - (24) - May 25, 2002, 07:52:09 AM EDT
                                             I see that as a self-inflicted problem - (ben_tilly) - (23) - May 25, 2002, 11:56:45 AM EDT
                                                 I am not unaware of the risks. - (static) - (3) - May 26, 2002, 10:35:49 PM EDT
                                                     The main reason for our difference... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - May 26, 2002, 11:18:21 PM EDT
                                                         *grin* -NT - (static) - May 27, 2002, 12:29:49 AM EDT
                                                         ROFL! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - May 27, 2002, 10:02:30 AM EDT
                                                 What do you think about this situation - (drewk) - (18) - May 28, 2002, 10:57:09 AM EDT
                                                     You are now dependent on your table structure - (ben_tilly) - (17) - May 28, 2002, 06:46:35 PM EDT
                                                         Should have been more explicit - (drewk) - (16) - May 29, 2002, 09:42:36 AM EDT
                                                             I would not be comfortable with that! - (ben_tilly) - (15) - May 29, 2002, 11:39:36 AM EDT
                                                                 Yes, I am doing things I didn't show - (drewk) - (14) - May 29, 2002, 11:53:39 AM EDT
                                                                     You're stopping short of a better solution. - (static) - (13) - May 29, 2002, 10:25:54 PM EDT
                                                                         6 of one, 1/2-dozen of the other - (drewk) - (12) - May 30, 2002, 09:56:00 AM EDT
                                                                             Slightly bigger difference - (ben_tilly) - (11) - May 30, 2002, 11:50:47 PM EDT
                                                                                 I must be missing something - (drewk) - (10) - May 31, 2002, 09:14:47 AM EDT
                                                                                     I know what you're overlooking. - (static) - (7) - June 1, 2002, 01:03:47 AM EDT
                                                                                         That could be nasty - (drewk) - (6) - June 4, 2002, 09:26:11 AM EDT
                                                                                             I don't know. - (static) - (5) - June 4, 2002, 06:16:32 AM EDT
                                                                                                 Out of curiousity - (ben_tilly) - (1) - June 4, 2002, 09:07:57 AM EDT
                                                                                                     I don't know. - (static) - June 5, 2002, 07:01:46 AM EDT
                                                                                                 So PHP supports hashes? - (drewk) - (2) - June 4, 2002, 09:27:42 AM EDT
                                                                                                     Yes. It does. - (static) - (1) - June 5, 2002, 07:00:02 AM EDT
                                                                                                         Blinding flash of the obvious - (drewk) - June 5, 2002, 09:33:11 AM EDT
                                                                                     Stupid question? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - June 3, 2002, 07:29:53 PM EDT
                                                                                         Why there's names to avoid - (drewk) - June 4, 2002, 09:24:45 AM EDT
                                     Agreed - (tjsinclair) - May 25, 2002, 10:57:53 AM EDT
                 Red Hat goes for Software Patents - (Andrew Grygus) - (8) - May 26, 2002, 02:57:37 PM EDT
                     I trust them for now - (ben_tilly) - (7) - May 26, 2002, 03:02:33 PM EDT
                         Let's just suppose . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - May 26, 2002, 03:41:55 PM EDT
                             I did say, "for now" - (ben_tilly) - May 26, 2002, 03:55:17 PM EDT
                         Re: I trust them for now - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - May 27, 2002, 10:21:40 AM EDT
                             Many patents lie dormant, until . . - (Andrew Grygus) - May 27, 2002, 11:12:04 AM EDT
                             I am aware of that - (ben_tilly) - (2) - May 27, 2002, 11:22:02 AM EDT
                                 I'm with Ben -- RH's patents may be good - (kmself) - (1) - May 27, 2002, 06:41:10 PM EDT
                                     Doverai ni proverai, perhaps. - (Ashton) - May 27, 2002, 09:12:58 PM EDT
         our buddy viewtouch must be thrilled -NT - (boxley) - May 23, 2002, 12:24:47 PM EDT