https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=trump&c=USA&e=&commit=Search
I'm sure MM is disappointed. ;-D
Cheers,
Scott.
I'm sure MM is disappointed. ;-D
Cheers,
Scott.
No Clinton, Sanders, Bush, or Romney in Panama Papers. Two Trump entities are.
https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=trump&c=USA&e=&commit=Search I'm sure MM is disappointed. ;-D Cheers, Scott. |
|
ROFL you are funnay
http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/the-clintons-connection-to-the-panama-papers/ Another name from the papers is billionaire Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate and longtime crony of Bill Clinton who has donated $100 million to the Clinton Foundation.not in their own name means the sleazy is in always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Oh gee, you think a panama corp might be nescessary for this?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Dig a little deeper.
These Trump entries don't seem to have much to do with the hotel operating there now. Unit 2710 defaulted - https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/10051325 5002 Inc dissolved in 2008 - https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/10050150 Fang Fu Ping is in China but has a registered address at Trump Tower - https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/nodes/12166530 Who knows what all this means - maybe it's legitimate. The only point is that Trump's name is on stuff there and the others aren't. FWIW. Cheers, Scott. |
|
clintons name is on a rape allegation trump isn't. Are you saying that matters?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two |
|
Non-sequitur much?
|
|
Unsurprising.
When it comes to what the meaning of the word "is" is, no one is better at obfuscation than the Clintons. |
|
Heh. Bill got clarification and answered the question. Something wrong with that?
Wikipedia: A much-quoted statement from Clinton's grand jury testimony showed him questioning the precise use of the word "is." Contending that his statement that "there's nothing going on between us" had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement".[4] Idiot lawyers trying to get a President in a perjury trap isn't something to be applauded. Cheers, Scott. |