When it comes to what the meaning of the word "is" is, no one is better at obfuscation than the Clintons.
Unsurprising.
When it comes to what the meaning of the word "is" is, no one is better at obfuscation than the Clintons. |
|
Heh. Bill got clarification and answered the question. Something wrong with that?
Wikipedia: A much-quoted statement from Clinton's grand jury testimony showed him questioning the precise use of the word "is." Contending that his statement that "there's nothing going on between us" had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the—if he—if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement".[4] Idiot lawyers trying to get a President in a perjury trap isn't something to be applauded. Cheers, Scott. |