how many packages shall be returned out-there as, "couldn't get it to work" ?
And it sounds as if the Z-glitch on your local net is more about Opera than Z. In brief, assuming that your evaluation of most of the contenders will be passed around in some way (?) it sounds as if the iPAQ would be seen to be much harder for an average bunch to set-up than Z (and others).
Shouldn't that count, in making the choice for a company? (See, I dunno how much personal autonomy there is in most places, where the Co. has to plan for reliable login of one? a few? models. (I could imagine wearing both hats here: less IT stress VS more choice -?-)
Now I hope you're just being fatalistic re the long-term outcome, especially re PDAs - which seem to me to be a long way from 'The Windoze Experience' anyway. However that battle gets fought though - it's probably true that the underlying OS (as with the Z) is apt to go unnoticed by many. :(
Ah if there were just one Killah Ap which would run on Z and not on the Beast..
Ashton
who hopes that the desktop Can be assaulted next - via the first 3 (not 1 or 2) Lx distros to: drop in the CD and go, presenting a pretty collection of useful office aps loadable by check-box, and a Tour of the place after it's created it. Beat the Toy-OS at 'convenience'.
Technically feasible now - have 3 of them learned to market yet?
Will M$ help - via increasingly Draconian costs, enforcements?
Have we sacrificed enough virgins?