IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Ghosting
Given that, surely the algorithms ought to have advanced in two decades? I mean, Chase is going to wind up eating these charges if they don't want their nearest branch firebombed*, the deductible of which will surely amount to more than $200. The technology that will make this post blip faintly at the NSA ought to have been able to register the irregular transactions at the end of der Alte's life, nicht?

cordially,

*Note to NSA: Kidding. Kidding! Geez, we didn't used to be afraid that this sort of thing would put us in Gitmo. Good thing we live in The Land of the Freeā€”not.
New The merchant will eat it
FTC says the consumer is only liable for the first $50. Visa/MC usually pick that up. The merchant will get debited. Perhaps their insurance will cover them.

You will have to do more than $50 worth of paperwork.
New Re: The merchant will eat it
I will do as much paperwork as is required. Chase will not get a single fucking penny.
     further reflections on credit card fraud - (rcareaga) - (6)
         Ghosting - (gcareaga) - (3)
             Re: Ghosting - (rcareaga) - (2)
                 The merchant will eat it - (gcareaga) - (1)
                     Re: The merchant will eat it - (rcareaga)
         Discover picked up a charge to buy a Starbucks value card. - (a6l6e6x)
         When I worked a contract out of state 10 years ago - (lincoln)

Thank you, drive through.
66 ms