If the Entire edjumacate-da-Box thread is really OVER [LRPD]

Post #381,991 by Ashton 10/10/13 5:06:02 PM Reply	If the Entire edjumacate-da-Box thread is really OVER [LRPD] [Oh.. Please!..] The only antidote to patently-false semantic word-$$-tricks, Massive Intransigence in the face of an entirely false premise re say, Just Who IS It that means to: FUCK--perpetually??--all ordinary Day-Labourers in the ear/nose/throat via --all means available to those with enough cash (ergo Power) to perpetually Game the/OUR 'System': LRPD advises, (excruciatingly-tortured-"logic" being ... just What It Says) *Let's face it: you can't Torquemada anything!*
Post #382,006 by boxley 10/10/13 10:07:12 PM Reply	yup Just Who IS It that means to: FUCK--perpetually??--all ordinary Day-Labourers in the ear/nose/throat via --all means available the companies that wont pay thew workers or the government who strips away what pittance is left and replaces that with more and more expensive vouchers that give you less and less service? They are the same asswipes Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #382,010 by CRConrad 10/11/13 1:37:44 AM Reply	Still the same false-equivalence bullpucky from you. No, they're NOT "the same asswipes". One side is MUCH MORE of a party of asswipes. How fucking STUPID does one have to be not to see that? (A: Stupid like, say, an empty box.) -- Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
Post #382,053 by boxley 10/12/13 11:34:49 AM Reply	Re: Still the same false-equivalence bullpucky from you. so still on the "Rich People! Rich People!!" bandwagon eh? So how man poor people are elected in the house and senate? Not poor in spirit, plenty of those but how many are not rich? Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #382,095 by CRConrad 10/14/13 2:40:18 AM Reply	As I said: What's wrong with that? Yes, I am, for the excellent rational reasons I already explained. Why don't you go answer that post, and explain why I -- or anyone else (except obviously the 1% themselves) -- shouldn't be? -- Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
Post #382,103 by folkert 10/14/13 8:08:32 AM Reply	They provide jobs! And Pay to much in taxes! </false_dichotomy type="boxley" style="Morton's Fork"> -- greg@gregfolkert.net "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
Post #382,130 by boxley 10/14/13 11:45:22 AM Reply	They provide jobs! And Pay taxes! fify Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #382,142 by folkert 10/14/13 12:33:22 PM Reply	Not really. They provide Critical Jobs and Pay To much in Taxes! Because BENGHAZI and SOLYNDRA! -- greg@gregfolkert.net "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
Post #382,156 by CRConrad 10/14/13 4:21:41 PM Reply	"Too", w. 2 'o'. HTH! Unless that's an imitation Tea Party spelling?
Post #382,166 by hnick 10/14/13 5:34:32 PM Reply	I believe that's an integrated feature of Boxlish...
Post #382,167 by drook 10/14/13 5:37:06 PM Reply	Forgot the quotes, here, take these " " -- Drew
Post #382,190 by crazy 10/14/13 9:21:28 PM Reply	Yes we do mwahahahaahahaahaha
Post #382,013 by Another Scott 10/11/13 8:01:56 AM Reply	Riddle me this, Boxman... Suppose Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. had won Florida in November 2000. How do you think the world would be different now? Thanks. Cheers, Scott.
Post #382,017 by mmoffitt 10/11/13 8:09:24 AM Reply	Suppose Jerry Brown had won in 1992.
Post #382,018 by Another Scott 10/11/13 8:16:09 AM Reply	Different question. Don't distract Boxman.
Post #382,039 by boxley 10/11/13 8:44:28 PM Reply	your carbon tax would be feckin ginormous Interesting question, pretending that the house would have let it stand. We would have been in Iraq much sooner and may have pulled the troops from Iraq 1 out of Saud and did more with the Turks to get to the North of Iraq in a tighter circle. With the troops out of Saud 9/11 may not have happened. He would have lost the second term because of dissatisfaction with the war. The housing bubble wouldn't have taken off because the economy would have been so moribound that derivatives never took off. Tea Party wouldnt have happened because regular folks would have gotten to vote for the regular republicans. With Mccain running with Jeb Bush as VP because he wasn't desperate for the right wing and being a few years younger might have replaced him. The dems would retake the house and the senate would be 51/49 The young Senator from Indiana would be a regular guelfing partner with Rep Boehner as they became the voice of reason in any bipartisan solutions. May have been a lot better Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #382,040 by Another Scott 10/11/13 9:24:20 PM Reply	Interesting thoughts...But I agree with your conclusion. :-)
Post #382,047 by crazy 10/11/13 11:50:51 PM Reply	Sorry, still would have sucked The housing bubble wouldn't have taken off because the economy would have been so moribound that derivatives never took off. This company was making many BILLIONS (no that was not a typo) when Clinton was president. Lots of other companies copied them. You met the guy who decided who to market to at my wedding. http://en.wikipedia....eriquest_Mortgage Ameriquest was among the first mortgage companies to use computers to search for prospective borrowers and to speed up the loan process and was accused of predatory lending practises (sic) by US regulators. No I did not write that, I'd have fixed the typo.
Post #382,048 by drook 10/12/13 9:16:05 AM Reply	My former company (temporarily) profited from that Ameriquest was pressuring appraisers to inflate values. My company did vendor management for appraisal and title services. Ameriquest installed us in their process so they could demonstrate an arm's-length relationship with the appraisers. Of course they still wanted the ability to provide "feedback" on "performance and quality". My former company is now a fifth the size it was. -- Drew
Post #382,050 by crazy 10/12/13 9:39:20 AM Reply	You took your feed from the "eastern" system. That was some fugly data. I got my monthly dump (of the entire thing, they should have not given me all those details) for my suppression list so I would not market to people that were already customers or prospects.
Post #382,059 by folkert 10/12/13 4:24:26 PM Reply	was this the... Smoke and mirrors company? -- greg@gregfolkert.net "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
Post #382,063 by drook 10/12/13 8:20:16 PM Reply	That's the one -- Drew

Welcome to IWETHEY!