Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #362,505 by rcareaga 9/12/12 2:09:17 PM Reply	Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you And frankly, mmoffitt, I take the strongest exception to your characterization of my logic as "tortured." Even were my thought processes faulty in this instance—which I do not for a moment concede—the proper term would be "enhanced logic." Do have a care. cordially,
Post #362,510 by mmoffitt 9/12/12 4:32:03 PM Reply	Noted. But, ... in this instance I was referring to Scott Lemieux's brand of logic being tortured. No offense intended toward yours.

Yeah, the two parties are the same. Give up. Let it burn. - (Another Scott) - (29) - Sept. 7, 2012, 09:53:31 PM EDT

Yes, they are - (SpiceWare) - (28) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:01:03 PM EDT

Point of order. - (Another Scott) - (27) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:31:57 PM EDT

the issue for me - (SpiceWare) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:54:43 PM EDT

Things can change for the better. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:26:49 PM EDT

it would change faster - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:40:20 PM EDT

Please see my reply below. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:53:51 PM EDT

Re: Point of order. - (hnick) - (22) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:26:36 PM EDT

Man - please lighten up a little. :-) - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:53:24 PM EDT

yeah, they'll really listen - (SpiceWare) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 04:17:05 PM EDT

It was an important call. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 04:51:53 PM EDT

it was Sheila being Sheila - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2012, 06:52:00 PM EDT

Meh. 14 years ago.... :-) - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 07:06:52 PM EDT

turning your stomach - (rcareaga) - (16) - Sept. 8, 2012, 07:48:35 PM EDT

<blush> You're far more eloquent than me. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 8, 2012, 09:05:42 PM EDT

I'm eloquent. You're cogent. There's a difference. -NT - (rcareaga) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:16:27 PM EDT

Who's Curly then? -NT - (malraux) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:20:19 PM EDT

Every man for himself! -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:23:45 PM EDT

Hey Moe! Poink. -NT - (crazy) - Sept. 9, 2012, 07:00:47 AM EDT

Re: turning your stomach - (hnick) - (2) - Sept. 9, 2012, 07:49:05 AM EDT

Don't. Lets reason together and get closer to the truth. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 9, 2012, 08:40:02 AM EDT

'course I don't want you to shut up. - (rcareaga) - Sept. 9, 2012, 09:41:11 PM EDT

Um, "not second-guess your ethical stance"? - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Sept. 10, 2012, 10:15:23 AM EDT

I was talking about *his* ethical stance - (rcareaga) - (6) - Sept. 10, 2012, 01:26:23 PM EDT

:0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Sept. 10, 2012, 02:38:36 PM EDT

further to nader - (rcareaga) - (4) - Sept. 12, 2012, 12:36:52 AM EDT

He makes a very strong case. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 12, 2012, 08:33:20 AM EDT

I thought it was a load of crap. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2012, 10:29:42 AM EDT

Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you - (rcareaga) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2012, 02:09:17 PM EDT

Noted. But, ... - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 12, 2012, 04:32:03 PM EDT

Of course the Satanists don't bother me any more ever since they did a background check on me and discovered I had three sixes in my birthdate.
51 ms