IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I haven't played with a Fire...
... but all the reviews say it's really very different from a "standard" Android device. Most cite UI problems and inconsistencies between most of the visible apps: all or nearly all of which are Amazon's. Things like the tiny Settings button you cited, as well as hardware issues. Real Android devices have hardware volume buttons, for instance, something the Fire doesn't have. And it's based on Android 2.3, not the 3.x and 4.x the Android tablets are.

It may sound harsh, but if you wanted to play with an Android tablet, you should have bought something else. The Fire is, as you say, for selling Amazon content, not for being a general purpose tablet.

Wade.
Just Add Story http://justaddstory.wordpress.com/
New I'm using it for development
Specifically, for the Amazon App Store. The Fire is a significant proportion of the traffic in that store.

I'll also be getting a "normal" Android device as well, but the Fire can be used to develop the interface to the Amazon in-app purchase APIs.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Ah...
A missing piece of information. :-) Now I see your choice was entirely valid.

Wade.
Just Add Story http://justaddstory.wordpress.com/
     First impressions: Kindle Fire - (malraux) - (10)
         The browser sucks... - (malraux) - (1)
             Working as designed. - (Another Scott)
         I haven't played with a Fire... - (static) - (2)
             I'm using it for development - (malraux) - (1)
                 Ah... - (static)
         How is it just as a reader/viewer? - (drook) - (4)
             Just like the Kindle app on an iPad - (malraux) - (3)
                 Hated the early Nook color - (drook) - (2)
                     Re: Hated the early Nook color - (malraux) - (1)
                         Ooh, new and shiny - (drook)

Those chicken wings are really spicy! Don't eat those!
69 ms