IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / wrong on one count
Post #350,733
by beepster
11/15/11 11:13:39 PM
Reply
New wrong on one count
It is southwests business if it happens on their plane

Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #350,742
by crazy
11/16/11 5:29:24 AM
Reply
New Which SW has already admitted to being wrong about
It is an incident of a poorly trained and/or biased rep opening her mouth when she shouldn't have.

"This is a family airline" is code for "DO WHAT I TELL YOU BASED ON MY RELIGIOUS VIEWS OR GET THE FUCK OFF THE PLANE, YOU F'ING DEVIANTS".

So the only thing left is the mop up action, dealing with people like the top poster here.
Post #350,743
by beepster
11/16/11 5:57:54 AM
Reply
New right, wrong dont matter
If the pilot working that flight doesnt like your shirt...you dont fly. You dont have an inaliable right to fly on their plane.

The apology is business cover.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
     "Like any other normal couple"? - (mmoffitt) - (68) - Nov. 14, 2011, 01:46:13 PM EST
         Yeah, why not? -NT - (drook) - (53) - Nov. 14, 2011, 02:05:09 PM EST
             Normal Couple? - (mmoffitt) - (52) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:00:50 PM EST
                 Re: Normal Couple? - (pwhysall) - (49) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:04:57 PM EST
                     "Normal" couple != "Normal couple". - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:25:33 PM EST
                         Gay is perfectly natural. - (pwhysall) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:42:21 PM EST
                             Being Black or White is not behavior. - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:51:09 PM EST
                                 Two things - (drook) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:11 PM EST
                                     That's an argument I'm not making. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:11:09 PM EST
                                         So, mmoffitt... - (rcareaga) - (5) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:25:58 AM EST
                                             Assuming your facts. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:23:08 AM EST
                                                 and yet, there seems something else at work here - (rcareaga) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:13:35 AM EST
                                                     There may be something else, I'll grant. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:25:46 AM EST
                                                         Nah. - (rcareaga) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:37:57 PM EST
                                                             In general, I do find public displays inappropriate. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:53:03 PM EST
                                         you have to get to 50% to be normal. - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:34:53 AM EST
                                             Not what I said. And you know it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:05:24 AM EST
                                                 No, that's *exactly* what you said -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:28:40 AM EST
                                             You deviate you -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 15, 2011, 12:09:28 PM EST
                                     It used to be - (scoenye) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 07:13:56 PM EST
                                         Yup, my mother went to Catholic school - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:02:13 AM EST
                                 No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:49 PM EST
                                     Re: No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:07:26 PM EST
                                         Time and demographics - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:15:53 PM EST
                                 So... - (folkert) - Nov. 14, 2011, 10:51:05 PM EST
                                 re: It's an abuse of the word normal - (altmann) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 02:55:49 AM EST
                                     :0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:03:29 AM EST
                         gasp - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:47:14 PM EST
                         Are American Indians "deviant"? - (drook) - (22) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:58:52 PM EST
                             It's called English. And I know how to use it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:40:51 PM EST
                                 Yup. Inflammatorily - (crazy) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:48:13 PM EST
                                     Um, no. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:53:19 PM EST
                                         Re: Um, no. - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:59:17 PM EST
                                             Forgive for being "textbook correct". :0) - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:30 PM EST
                                         Yes, there is a dispute - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:00 PM EST
                                             So, your conjecture is... - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:04:38 PM EST
                                                 Enjoy - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:09:33 PM EST
                                                 DING! - (drook) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:10:23 PM EST
                                                     Consequence of the argument you made. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:12:53 PM EST
                                                         Here, a quiz for you - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:20 PM EST
                                                         Still framing it as "behavior" ... still wrong -NT - (drook) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:41 PM EST
                                                             The existence of the species tells me I'm right. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:16:38 PM EST
                                                                 Go read my book quote - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:20:06 PM EST
                                                                     Re: Go read my book quote - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:39:41 PM EST
                                                                         Easy googleable targets get knocked down -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:58:52 PM EST
                                     Re: Yup. Inflammatorily - (beepster) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:20 PM EST
                                         B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:45 PM EST
                                             see my other post. -NT - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:07 PM EST
                                             "accepted" - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:13:40 PM EST
                                                 The species. HTH. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:31:18 AM EST
                                                     You asked it? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:34:40 AM EST
                         You're applying statistical definitions... - (static) - Nov. 14, 2011, 06:59:08 PM EST
                         yes normal - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2011, 09:08:38 PM EST
                 Human sexuality is powerful and erratic. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:24:25 AM EST
                     There's a reason they call it "vanilla". - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 04:51:15 AM EST
         It really depends on how you read that, doesn't it? - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 08:03:54 PM EST
             It's much more fun to use technically accurate, loaded words - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:29:57 AM EST
                 Project much? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:35:18 AM EST
         Took a day, but I figured out the problem - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:17:18 PM EST
             no boggle zone? cmon, mikey can boggle and we can educate - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:25:05 PM EST
                 Hmmmmm. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:05:20 AM EST
             I thought it was just a boring problem of definition. -NT - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:45:59 PM EST
             wrong on one count - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:13:39 PM EST
                 Which SW has already admitted to being wrong about - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:29:24 AM EST
                     right, wrong dont matter - (beepster) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:57:54 AM EST
             I took a few days, too. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:40:20 AM EST
                 This is why scientists can't do politics - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:03:13 AM EST
                     Right - that's the real problem. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:15:14 AM EST
                     Re: This is why scientists can't do politics - (pwhysall) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:22:08 AM EST

It looks like food.
127 ms