gasp

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #350,584

by beepster

11/14/11 3:47:14 PM

gasp

you must be completely homophobic!

Why, views like that are positively last century.

(and yes, I'm joking with you).

You cannot use the word "normal" in that context any longer. Faux Pas.

Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.

"Like any other normal couple"? - (mmoffitt) - (68) - Nov. 14, 2011, 01:46:13 PM EST

Yeah, why not? -NT - (drook) - (53) - Nov. 14, 2011, 02:05:09 PM EST

Normal Couple? - (mmoffitt) - (52) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:00:50 PM EST

Re: Normal Couple? - (pwhysall) - (49) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:04:57 PM EST

"Normal" couple != "Normal couple". - (mmoffitt) - (48) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:25:33 PM EST

Gay is perfectly natural. - (pwhysall) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:42:21 PM EST

Being Black or White is not behavior. - (mmoffitt) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:51:09 PM EST

Two things - (drook) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:11 PM EST

That's an argument I'm not making. - (mmoffitt) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:11:09 PM EST

So, mmoffitt... - (rcareaga) - (5) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:25:58 AM EST

Assuming your facts. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:23:08 AM EST

and yet, there seems something else at work here - (rcareaga) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:13:35 AM EST

There may be something else, I'll grant. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:25:46 AM EST

Nah. - (rcareaga) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:37:57 PM EST

In general, I do find public displays inappropriate. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 15, 2011, 03:53:03 PM EST

you have to get to 50% to be normal. - (boxley) - (3) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:34:53 AM EST

Not what I said. And you know it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:05:24 AM EST

No, that's *exactly* what you said -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 10:28:40 AM EST

You deviate you -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 15, 2011, 12:09:28 PM EST

It used to be - (scoenye) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 07:13:56 PM EST

Yup, my mother went to Catholic school - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:02:13 AM EST

No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:49 PM EST

Re: No, it's an insult when claimed something isn't normal - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:07:26 PM EST

Time and demographics - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:15:53 PM EST

So... - (folkert) - Nov. 14, 2011, 10:51:05 PM EST

re: It's an abuse of the word normal - (altmann) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 02:55:49 AM EST

:0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:03:29 AM EST

gasp - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:47:14 PM EST

Are American Indians "deviant"? - (drook) - (22) - Nov. 14, 2011, 03:58:52 PM EST

It's called English. And I know how to use it. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (21) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:40:51 PM EST

Yup. Inflammatorily - (crazy) - (20) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:48:13 PM EST

Um, no. - (mmoffitt) - (13) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:53:19 PM EST

Re: Um, no. - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:59:17 PM EST

Forgive for being "textbook correct". :0) - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:30 PM EST

Yes, there is a dispute - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:00 PM EST

So, your conjecture is... - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:04:38 PM EST

Enjoy - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:09:33 PM EST

DING! - (drook) - (7) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:10:23 PM EST

Consequence of the argument you made. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:12:53 PM EST

Here, a quiz for you - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:20 PM EST

Still framing it as "behavior" ... still wrong -NT - (drook) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:14:41 PM EST

The existence of the species tells me I'm right. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:16:38 PM EST

Go read my book quote - (crazy) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:20:06 PM EST

Re: Go read my book quote - (beepster) - (1) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:39:41 PM EST

Easy googleable targets get knocked down -NT - (crazy) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:58:52 PM EST

Re: Yup. Inflammatorily - (beepster) - (5) - Nov. 14, 2011, 04:57:20 PM EST

B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:00:45 PM EST

see my other post. -NT - (beepster) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:02:07 PM EST

"accepted" - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 05:13:40 PM EST

The species. HTH. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:31:18 AM EST

You asked it? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:34:40 AM EST

You're applying statistical definitions... - (static) - Nov. 14, 2011, 06:59:08 PM EST

yes normal - (boxley) - Nov. 14, 2011, 09:08:38 PM EST

Human sexuality is powerful and erratic. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 01:24:25 AM EST

There's a reason they call it "vanilla". - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 04:51:15 AM EST

It really depends on how you read that, doesn't it? - (Another Scott) - (2) - Nov. 14, 2011, 08:03:54 PM EST

It's much more fun to use technically accurate, loaded words - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:29:57 AM EST

Project much? -NT - (drook) - Nov. 15, 2011, 08:35:18 AM EST

Took a day, but I figured out the problem - (drook) - (10) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:17:18 PM EST

no boggle zone? cmon, mikey can boggle and we can educate - (boxley) - (1) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:25:05 PM EST

Hmmmmm. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 16, 2011, 08:05:20 AM EST

I thought it was just a boring problem of definition. -NT - (static) - Nov. 15, 2011, 09:45:59 PM EST

wrong on one count - (beepster) - (2) - Nov. 15, 2011, 11:13:39 PM EST

Which SW has already admitted to being wrong about - (crazy) - (1) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:29:24 AM EST

right, wrong dont matter - (beepster) - Nov. 16, 2011, 05:57:54 AM EST

I took a few days, too. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:40:20 AM EST

This is why scientists can't do politics - (drook) - (2) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:03:13 AM EST

Right - that's the real problem. - (mmoffitt) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:15:14 AM EST

Re: This is why scientists can't do politics - (pwhysall) - Nov. 17, 2011, 10:22:08 AM EST

iwethey.org