You see (maybe not), that it isn't about say, "Watch Here for info on how to plan an attack!" on (whatever.)
It's about referencing attacks-made.
Often, it seems from text: attacks on truthiness or on simple facts. Hope this clears that up for you.

(I forget what we call that thing.. you know, where people 'communicate information' that seems relevant to their general aims?)
OTOH I found a lot missing there: the scatological language of ad-hominen vitriol now so characteristic of certain other 'information collecting' groups, for just a start.
The sentences appear to have subjects and predicates, with pretty clear syntax, to 'boot'
(the closest you might sanely insert that word into the matter, I wot.)

Actually, I'd bet that the number of visitors' shirt colors matching 'brown' to be found in some plebiscite of visitors (well, except trolls, of course)
would likely fit a Gaussian of the general populations' preferences--in olden times before there were anti-fact brigades and gaggles of the wanna-be Rupured-Out.

As to site colors, white/blk. background is easier on eyes than versa vice. And employing 'red' for emphasis--keeps the frills minimal, as in KISS.
You'd prefer puce and ecru, perhaps? Jeez: tell them; they won't send a goon squad to spray-paint your house about Hating Jesus/or similar.

(Maybe you discard a lot of books because of the dust-cover design too, eh?)

Carrion.