IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
News Picks Forum
/
Re: Must be written to InternetExploder 5+
Post #34,481
by
JayMehaffey
4/4/02 11:57:02 PM
Reply
Re: Must be written to InternetExploder 5+
It works for me with Mozilla .99 under Linux.
If I pull up the page info some of it displays wrong though, in a way that makes me suspect that one or more of the Gifs they have inbedded in the page is invalid.
Jay
weell doggies! Ellie May get yer cute ass over here
- (
boxley
)
- (11)
- April 4, 2002, 01:45:54 PM EST
OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9
- (
Ashton
)
- (9)
- April 4, 2002, 04:00:30 PM EST
Must be written to InternetExploder 5+
- (
drewk
)
- (3)
- April 4, 2002, 04:24:02 PM EST
It may be at the OS level
- (
hnick
)
- (1)
- April 4, 2002, 05:18:30 PM EST
Moz 0.99 on OS X works
-NT
- (
tjsinclair
)
- April 4, 2002, 06:18:44 PM EST
Re: Must be written to InternetExploder 5+
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- April 4, 2002, 11:57:02 PM EST
Re: OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9
- (
pwhysall
)
- April 5, 2002, 12:42:32 AM EST
Maybe something odd in WW, then..
- (
Ashton
)
- April 5, 2002, 04:05:22 AM EST
Works right under Linux 2.4 + Mozilla .9.9
- (
scoenye
)
- April 5, 2002, 12:39:59 PM EST
Re: OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (1)
- April 5, 2002, 01:47:46 PM EST
Curiouser n'curiouser
- (
Ashton
)
- April 5, 2002, 03:59:54 PM EST
Possibly questionable research.
- (
static
)
- April 6, 2002, 12:45:07 AM EST
i
we
they
.org
Resistance is useless. You will assimilate us.
35 ms