IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / It may be at the OS level
Post #34,440
by hnick
4/4/02 5:18:30 PM
Reply
New It may be at the OS level
I just picked it up (url = [link|http://www.iht.com/articles/53577.html|http://www.iht.com/...s/53577.html]) on moz 0.9.9 under win2k. Ashton is using a lightened w98 variant. Later I'll try it from a linux box.
I don't know enough about browser technology to know why one should work and the other won't.
Could be OS.. could be difference in firewalls, protectors, yadayada...
I'll report back later with the linux story if nobody beats me to it.

Hugh
Post #34,445
by tjsinclair
4/4/02 6:18:44 PM
Reply
New Moz 0.99 on OS X works
Tom Sinclair
"Subverting Young Minds Since 03/13/2000"
     weell doggies! Ellie May get yer cute ass over here - (boxley) - (11) - April 4, 2002, 01:45:54 PM EST
         OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9 - (Ashton) - (9) - April 4, 2002, 04:00:30 PM EST
             Must be written to InternetExploder 5+ - (drewk) - (3) - April 4, 2002, 04:24:02 PM EST
                 It may be at the OS level - (hnick) - (1) - April 4, 2002, 05:18:30 PM EST
                     Moz 0.99 on OS X works -NT - (tjsinclair) - April 4, 2002, 06:18:44 PM EST
                 Re: Must be written to InternetExploder 5+ - (JayMehaffey) - April 4, 2002, 11:57:02 PM EST
             Re: OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9 - (pwhysall) - April 5, 2002, 12:42:32 AM EST
             Maybe something odd in WW, then.. - (Ashton) - April 5, 2002, 04:05:22 AM EST
             Works right under Linux 2.4 + Mozilla .9.9 - (scoenye) - April 5, 2002, 12:39:59 PM EST
             Re: OT: So much for "W3C//DTD HTML 4.0" + Mozilla .9.9 - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 5, 2002, 01:47:46 PM EST
                 Curiouser n'curiouser - (Ashton) - April 5, 2002, 03:59:54 PM EST
         Possibly questionable research. - (static) - April 6, 2002, 12:45:07 AM EST

"I couldn't have done it without him, sir."

"Cheek."
47 ms