IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Thanks, that helps.
I'm going to have to read it a couple more times to completely absorb it, but that does help. Thanks again.
New It appears that they deserve it.
They are apparently trying to avoid using system resources for some reason and rolling their own "lightweight" mutexes. They appear to be useless outside the process that generates them. I usually used mutexes to sync up operations in separate process and IPC functions. I would never have looked that futexes. Looks like reinventing an inferior wheel.
As they used to say on Laugh In, "very interesting... but stupid"
New Anything by Ulrich Drepper, makes my head hurt.
A lot of people don't like him. He is sort of like the OpenBSD guy in that respect.
New Mutexes of any sort are tricky.

Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers?
A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.
     appeal to the java gods - (boxley) - (12)
         futex = fast userspace mutex. - (static)
         You can't get rid of the time checks unless you want to - (crazy) - (9)
             Re: You can't get rid of the time checks unless you want to - (hnick) - (6)
                 Futexes are tricky - (crazy) - (5)
                     Thanks, that helps. - (hnick) - (2)
                         Cursed as well - (crazy) - (1)
                             It appears that they deserve it. - (hnick)
                     Anything by Ulrich Drepper, makes my head hurt. - (folkert)
                     Mutexes of any sort are tricky. -NT - (static)
             the coder doesnt have a clue - (boxley) - (1)
                 It might be buried in a library he's using. - (static)
         potential partial solution - (boxley)

Obeying the Three Laws of Thermodynamics since 2001.
128 ms