Any law at all == totalitarianism

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #331,757 by mhuber 8/24/10 3:17:15 PM Reply	Any law at all == totalitarianism Why, yes, I am sipping a cup of tea, why do you ask? --------------------------------------- I think it's perfectly clear we're in the wrong band. (Tori Amos)
Post #331,832 by Ashton 8/25/10 3:59:26 PM Reply	;^> ... [Â© CRC. He says.] I could almost see voting for Palin in 2012 on the grounds that this sorry ratfucking excuse for a republic, this savage, smirking, predatory empire deserves her. Bring on the Rapture, motherfuckers! -- via RC
Post #332,596 by CRConrad 9/15/10 11:14:47 AM Reply	Bet I got it from someone. I only introduced it to IWT. ^_^
Post #332,598 by folkert 9/15/10 11:27:59 AM Reply	Nice to see you stop by again. Make it more often... I often miss your sense of clarity.

its acorns fault - (boxley) - (51) - Aug. 24, 2010, 12:07:24 PM EDT

Let's see if I follow this - (drook) - (50) - Aug. 24, 2010, 12:51:18 PM EDT

you got it :-) - (boxley) - Aug. 24, 2010, 01:11:02 PM EDT

Not necessarily - (beepster) - (48) - Aug. 24, 2010, 01:52:35 PM EDT

I don't see it - (drook) - (43) - Aug. 24, 2010, 02:08:38 PM EDT

Where you stand depends on where you sit - (crazy) - (40) - Aug. 25, 2010, 06:20:00 AM EDT

who is paying the bill? - (boxley) - (39) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:43:32 AM EDT

Doesn't Net Neutrality help customers? - (drook) - (38) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:35:13 AM EDT

or... - (folkert) - (37) - Aug. 25, 2010, 11:53:59 AM EDT

it isnt, and they would lose you as a customer to a telco - (boxley) - (36) - Aug. 25, 2010, 12:07:34 PM EDT

Why would the other be any better? - (drook) - (35) - Aug. 25, 2010, 12:20:57 PM EDT

why do you think that is the plan? - (boxley) - (34) - Aug. 25, 2010, 02:47:15 PM EDT

NAF's comments. - (Another Scott) - (33) - Aug. 25, 2010, 03:43:55 PM EDT

correct - (boxley) - (8) - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:02:46 PM EDT

I get my email from my web host, not my ISP - (drook) - (7) - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:22:38 PM EDT

Ditto. We've never checked our e-mail on our Cox account. -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:46:07 PM EDT

whoosh, point=missed - (boxley) - (5) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:24:50 PM EDT

Is that what it means? Really? - (drook) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:39:42 PM EDT

Specious argument. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:42:19 PM EDT

so downloading porn == telephone service. okay -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:52:26 PM EDT

QOS is NOT the issue here. - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:22:17 PM EDT

bullshit greg, you know better - (boxley) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:59:36 PM EDT

Oh, cool, code words... - (beepster) - (23) - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:23:11 PM EDT

It *is* telecom - (drook) - (22) - Aug. 25, 2010, 05:34:01 PM EDT

Doesn't mean... - (beepster) - (21) - Aug. 25, 2010, 06:14:40 PM EDT

You don't like the USF. Now tell me why it's not a telecom. -NT - (drook) - (20) - Aug. 25, 2010, 06:27:04 PM EDT

doesnt use the AIN so its not a telecom, no a-links needed - (boxley) - (4) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:28:14 PM EDT

Verizon says you're wrong - (drook) - (3) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:50:14 PM EDT

federal court said you are wrong, they should know - (boxley) - (2) - Aug. 25, 2010, 08:55:20 PM EDT

Have you read Brand X? - (drook) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:22:36 PM EDT

hafta take this offline if you are really interested -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 25, 2010, 11:03:52 PM EDT

I didn't say it wasn't telecom - (beepster) - (14) - Aug. 25, 2010, 09:20:15 PM EDT

Sure, it's all about TAXes. As always. Sure... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (13) - Aug. 25, 2010, 09:32:06 PM EDT

Is that NOT what you think - (beepster) - (12) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:05:25 PM EDT

Let's see. - (Another Scott) - (11) - Aug. 25, 2010, 10:55:34 PM EDT

Re: Let's see. - (boxley) - (4) - Aug. 25, 2010, 11:02:55 PM EDT

... -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 25, 2010, 11:30:21 PM EDT

So you're in favour of letting people starve to death? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Sept. 15, 2010, 11:11:59 AM EDT

point=missed - (boxley) - Sept. 15, 2010, 12:43:09 PM EDT

Considering that you are {unnaturally!} oft better-informed - (Ashton) - Sept. 15, 2010, 04:19:35 PM EDT

Let's see, part B - (drook) - Aug. 26, 2010, 02:35:40 AM EDT

So who will pay - (beepster) - (4) - Aug. 26, 2010, 07:46:02 AM EDT

you already did, part of the stimulus package -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Aug. 26, 2010, 10:49:50 AM EDT

But I also pay - (beepster) - (2) - Aug. 26, 2010, 04:30:19 PM EDT

Poor beepster ... could your taxes be so onerous - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 15, 2010, 04:06:23 PM EDT

bwah ha ha - (beepster) - Sept. 15, 2010, 04:23:01 PM EDT

Given rulings on fair use and other new technologies - (beepster) - (1) - Aug. 25, 2010, 01:22:36 PM EDT

We already know what the Telcos et al want to do - (drook) - Aug. 25, 2010, 01:27:37 PM EDT

Any law at all == totalitarianism - (mhuber) - (3) - Aug. 24, 2010, 03:17:15 PM EDT

Bet I got it from someone. I only introduced it to IWT. ^_^ -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Sept. 15, 2010, 11:14:47 AM EDT

Nice to see you stop by again. - (folkert) - Sept. 15, 2010, 11:27:59 AM EDT

iwethey.org

This is untested and you're my guinea pig.
70 ms