Post #327,399
6/5/10 2:46:12 AM
|
This sucks
I'm starting to work with a group of food writers that focuses on locally-grown, organic, etc. One of them has a new book that's sold as many in two weeks as mine has in two years, and is selling two per day now. I just got the sample chapter and it has a whopper of a factual error in the central point that it's making.
I can't recommend it to my audience, I know that. Now I'm trying to figure out if I should offer to fact check it for her, because it clearly needs it.
Oh, her target market for it? It's a nutrition textbook for homeschoolers.
--
Drew
|
Post #327,401
6/5/10 3:56:47 AM
|
****, yes!
The homeschooled are notorious for their misconceptions and organic farming is another source of misconceptions. Fix the errors and you prevent a stupid policy in future. Convincing the author to realise his mistake is the hard part, of course.
--------------------------------------------
Matthew Greet
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
|
Post #327,408
6/5/10 9:27:04 AM
|
Watch that broad brush.
People who homeschool for *religious* reasons may be notorious for their misconceptions... secular homeschoolers are often there because of the shoddy education provided by many public schools.
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #327,429
6/5/10 9:13:41 PM
|
Secular homschoolee here
OK, there was instruction in religion, but the homeschooling was for secular reasons.
And except for math (which I ended up majoring in college) I did pretty well...
---------------------------------------
I think it's perfectly clear we're in the wrong band.
(Tori Amos)
|
Post #327,431
6/5/10 9:15:27 PM
|
did that once, majorly sux
got him a HS diploma though but since has been studying advanced stupidity
|
Post #327,402
6/5/10 7:00:38 AM
|
Books usually have errors.
Whether due to the author, or due to the production process, errors slip in. That's one of the reasons why there are 2nd, 3rd, etc., editions.
Yeah, it sucks that it is related to her thesis, but that happens.
I'd point it out to her. If you have the time, offer to help - networking is always good. You never know where it might lead. :-)
Good luck!
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #327,413
6/5/10 1:39:06 PM
|
Already have, waiting to hear back
--
Drew
|
Post #327,418
6/5/10 5:11:39 PM
|
I find errors on my CloveGarden pages all the time . . .
. . most often when a new purchase forces me to review and re-research older stuff.
Today's find: my rice page listed Camolino rice as an Egyptian short grained rice. Well, it is likely to be short grained (Giza 177/178 Sakha 101/102/103/104), but the real definition is that it is any kind of rice finish milled with oil, thus lightly oil coated. Haven't seen any of that around here, but I'll keep my eyes open now.
|
Post #327,419
6/5/10 5:14:10 PM
|
Different class of error
You know how carrots are good for your eyes?
Except you know how that's wartime propaganda? http://www.snopes.co...dient/carrots.asp
That's the lead example in a book about how real food is good for us, while recommendations from the government are more about corporate interests than our health.
Oops.
--
Drew
|
Post #327,420
6/5/10 5:32:53 PM
|
Wait a minute.
From your Snopes link:
While carrots are a good source of vitamin A (which is important for healthy eyesight, skin, growth, and resisting infection), eating them won't improve vision.
Vitamin A is important, and carrots are a good source. No, they won't give you 20-15 vision, but Vitamin A deficiency will do a number on your eyes - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_A .
Vitamin A is a vitamin that is needed by the retina of the eye in the form of a specific metabolite, the light-absorbing molecule retinal. This molecule is absolutely necessary for both scotopic and color vision. Vitamin A also functions in a very different role, as an irreversibly oxidized form retinoic acid, which is an important hormone-like growth factor for epithelial and other cells.
Enough is needed. Extra won't help and may hurt (I had orange skin when I was eating a pound of carrots a day for several weeks (long ago)).
Depending on what she wrote, (and bringing corporate interests into it could be problematic) I don't see a big problem with fixing this. It's a matter of being careful.
My $0.02. :-)
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #327,428
6/5/10 8:58:18 PM
|
Here's my point though
http://kidshealth.or...itamin_chart.html
Good sources of vitamin A are milk, eggs, liver, fortified cereals, darkly colored orange or green vegetables (such as carrots, sweet potatoes, pumpkin, and kale), and orange fruits such as cantaloupe, apricots, peaches, papayas, and mangos.
We "all know" carrots are good for vision. But no more so than lots of other foods are, many of which are more appetizing.
So why do we all know about carrots? Because of a government propaganda effort.
No, they didn't make up something out of whole cloth. The best propaganda is always close enough to the truth that people of good faith can at least take it seriously.
In this case, the point she was making was that scientists tried to isolate the nutrient in carrots that was good for vision, and they focused on beta carotene. And of course they were wrong, ha ha! It was the whole food that was effective.
Except that's not it either. Even the whole food isn't exceptionally good for vision. At best it can alleviate a deficiency that might cause problems. No study has suggested that vitamin A, or beta carotene, or whole carrots, actually improves vision for people who don't have any problems.
So if someone does have vitamin A deficiency, eating carrots can help. That fact doesn't make carrots the poster child for eating whole foods instead of the supplements the government would have you take instead.
The switch from butter to margarine ... cholesterol causes heart disease ... red meat will make you fat ... eat less meat and more grains ... Any one of these would be a better example.
--
Drew
|
Post #327,430
6/5/10 9:14:05 PM
|
also eating too many carrots is no good for you
vitey A is fat soluble
|