IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Only surprised in one thing
I'm only surprised here that they are targeting Anderson before Enron.

If nothing else, both companies must have violated some laws in that little frenzy of evidence shreading right before the collapse.

But why start with Anderson?

Jay
New Easier to prove Obs. of Just. than viol..s of securities law
New Re: Why start with Andersen?
Because they aren't Bushie boy's oil buddies, and ya gotta have a show for the peepul.
The best scale for an experimental design is ten millimeters to the centimeter.
     DOJ going for criminal charges against Arthur Andersen - (marlowe) - (13)
         complete agreement - (boxley)
         Only surprised in one thing - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
             Easier to prove Obs. of Just. than viol..s of securities law -NT - (Another Scott)
             Re: Why start with Andersen? - (Silverlock)
         Shredding, be interesting - (wharris2)
         Can't do that - (tablizer) - (5)
             INAL, but try pollution violations, anti-trust, frauds. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
             Sure you can - (Yendor) - (3)
                 Re: You are now the sole proprietor of Tablizer, Inc - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     Oops - (Yendor)
                 still civil - (tablizer)
         Arthur Andersen is dead anyway, at least the accounting side - (mhuber) - (1)
             Full agreement. And I vote on those proxies. -NT - (a6l6e6x)

Mmmmmm... whale beer!
65 ms