IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Stephen Fry pipes in
He went to his first Apple product release and wrote about it in his blog
There are many issues you could have with the iPad. No multitasking, still no Flash. No camera, no GPS. They all fall away the minute you use it. I cannot emphasise enough this point: “Hold your judgment until you’ve spent five minutes with it”. ... The moment you experience it in your hands you know this is class. This is a different order of experience. The speed, the responsiveness, the smooth glide of it, the richness and detail of the display, the heft in your hand, the rightness of the actions and gestures that you employ, untutored and instinctively, it’s not just a scaled up iPhone or a scaled-down multitouch enhanced laptop – it is a whole new kind of device. And it will change so much.

http://www.stephenfr...01/28/ipad-about/
New Everyone keeps saying "No Flash"
But it's got a YouTube app. Doesn't YouTube use flash for its movies? Does Apple have a back-door that lets their app grab the raw movie files?
--

Drew
New YouTube switched to H.264 a while back
The flash player plays it back on their web site while the H.264 file is played back directly by Apple TV and the YouTube App.
http://newteevee.com...-thanks-to-apple/

The ClickToFlash flash-blocker for Safari has an option to play back the H.264 video via QuickTime instead of via Flash player.
http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/

I had been using that option, but recently YouTube opened an HTML5 beta option and I've been using it instead. It plays back the H.264 video via the new <video> tag. I think Chrome and Safari are the only browsers that support it (Firefox does support the <video> tag, but only for ogg files)
http://www.youtube.com/html5
https://developer.mo..._video_in_FireFox




Gruber also has a rather insightful blog entry about why Flash won't be on the iPhone or iPad - the gist of which is that Flash is the #1 cause of crashes in OS X (per the crash reports submitted to Apple), but it's not something that Apple can do anything about.
http://daringfirebal...apple_adobe_flash
New Thanks for the pointers.
Few things have given me as much trouble on Linux as Flash. Adobe has shown that it can write good code in the past, but much of their stuff has gotten incredibly bloated. Why on earth should a PDF viewer be as huge, slow, and fragile as Acrobat Reader 8 (a 217 MB tree on WinXP here)?

That old saw has seemingly been updated to: "The Internet treats Adobe as damage and routes around it." I'm glad it's progressing reasonably well.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Looks like Vimeo is switching as well
http://gizmodo.com/5...-kill-flash-video
Vimeo's new HTML5 system is just like YouTube's, in both execution and technical details, in that it'll only work with a few browsers—Safari and Chrome, for now—and that it's compatible with most, but not all, of the company's video libraries.
New HTML 5 video and H.264.
This is shaping up to be a big big issue. There are reasons for H.264 (it's *the* professional standard) and there are reasons against H.264 (it requires royalty payments). Firefox/Mozilla have said they can't support H.264 because of the latter and they don't want to devolve it to the OS. Meanwhile, Apple and Google have shown their hand, so it will be interesting to see which way Microsoft jumps.

Wade.

Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers?
A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.
New Re: which way Microsoft jumps
... The wrong way. With both feet. Into quicksand and no "willing" lifeguard on duty.
New ... so you think they'll ignore the <video> tag? :-)
That would be monumentally stupid.

Which means that's probably what they'll do. Except I know the IE guys would try to fight against that...

I actually meant whether they go for H.264 support, Ogg Theora or devolve it to the OS. I think when push comes to shove, they'll support the video tag by devolving codec support to the OS, which means they'll try to promote WMV. And they're already too late to try that... That would be the second fail. Could MS be so stupid?

Wade.

Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers?
A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.
New Video playback *should* be done by the OS IMO
Why should every app have its own code for playing video?

The way it should work (and it may already) is whenever the browser sees a media file, it should check for a plugin that handles it, next see if it's built into the browser, next see if the OS handles it, then fail. Sort of like CSS: check the most specific first before bubbling up to the more generic.

Then if someone has a new codec -- either a whole new format or a better way of handling an old one -- plug it in to the browser. Eventually that code (or something like it) makes it into the browser. Then into the OS.

I guess the tricky part is when video cards arrive that support it in hardware before support has trickled down to the OS, which is where Apple says, "Your app doesn't get to access the hardware."
--

Drew
New For the reasons you mention...
...this may be a very, very bad decision on the Mozilla Foundation's part.
New I wonder if they're trying to rope MPEG-LA into the fray.
After all, the Mozilla Foundation could say that they want to support H.264 because that's what everyone is asking for, but the licencing rules make it difficult... I bet MPEG-LA probably don't want to be part of that discussion.

Wade.

Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers?
A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.
New Re: Everyone keeps saying "No Flash"
No Flash is a feature, not a bug.
     Why the Apple tablet will change the world. - (Another Scott) - (35)
         Imagine this interface - (crazy)
         as a replacement to the legal pad sure, I can see that - (boxley)
         iPad it is. - (Another Scott) - (12)
             Cynic - (drook) - (1)
                 :-) Pioneers get to live without features and pay more. -NT - (Another Scott)
             Prices. - (Another Scott) - (9)
                 the $699 one... - (folkert) - (8)
                     That must be some Mini! :-) - (Another Scott) - (4)
                         Re: That must be some Mini! :-) - (SpiceWare) - (1)
                             Good point. - (Another Scott)
                         Re: That must be some Mini! :-) - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             I don't think that's entirely fair. - (static)
                     Wonder how sturdy the keyboard dock is - (drook) - (1)
                         thought so too - (SpiceWare)
                     Not to be a party-pooper... - (static)
         Yes, I will be getting one -NT - (Bman) - (2)
             NOOOO. You are kidding. - (folkert) - (1)
                 Re: NOOOO. You are kidding. - (Bman)
         15 minute interview with John Gruber - (SpiceWare)
         I'm wondering... - (folkert) - (2)
             :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
             Or ChicAAAAAgo -NT - (drook)
         Stephen Fry pipes in - (SpiceWare) - (11)
             Everyone keeps saying "No Flash" - (drook) - (10)
                 YouTube switched to H.264 a while back - (SpiceWare) - (8)
                     Thanks for the pointers. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Looks like Vimeo is switching as well - (SpiceWare)
                     HTML 5 video and H.264. - (static) - (5)
                         Re: which way Microsoft jumps - (folkert) - (2)
                             ... so you think they'll ignore the <video> tag? :-) - (static) - (1)
                                 Video playback *should* be done by the OS IMO - (drook)
                         For the reasons you mention... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             I wonder if they're trying to rope MPEG-LA into the fray. - (static)
                 Re: Everyone keeps saying "No Flash" - (pwhysall)
         it's for the masses - (SpiceWare)

Your boredness knob must go to 11...
74 ms